Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legal Profession Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Criminal Law

Michigan Law Review

Lawyers

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Legal Profession

Are Criminal Defenders Different?, David Luban Jun 1993

Are Criminal Defenders Different?, David Luban

Michigan Law Review

No one has done more to expose the jurisprudential incoherence of this view of legal practice than William Simon. In his 1978 article, The Ideology of Advocacy, Simon demonstrated a series of internal contradictions in the most promising attempts to justify the ideology of advocacy. Subsequently, in Ethical Discretion in Lawyering, Simon elaborated an alternative view according to which lawyers must exercise independent judgment in both their choice of clients and their choice of means in pursuing client ends.

In Simon's view, those who carve out the criminal defense exception have been taken in by what he calls …


Reply: Further Reflections On Libertarian Criminal Defense, William H. Simon Jun 1993

Reply: Further Reflections On Libertarian Criminal Defense, William H. Simon

Michigan Law Review

Since David Luban's is the work on legal ethics that I admire and agree with most, there is an element of perversity in my vehement critique of his arguments on criminal defense. I am therefore especially thankful for his gracious and thoughtful response. Nevertheless, I remain convinced that Luban is mistaken in excepting criminal defense from much of the responsibility to substantive justice that we both think appropriate in every other sphere of lawyering.


The Ethics Of Criminal Defense, William H. Simon Jun 1993

The Ethics Of Criminal Defense, William H. Simon

Michigan Law Review

A large literature has emerged in recent years challenging the standard conception of adversary advocacy that justifies the lawyer in doing anything arguably legal to advance the client's ends. This literature has proposed variations on an ethic that would increase the lawyer's responsibilities to third parties, the public, and substantive ideals of legal merit and justice.

With striking consistency, this literature exempts criminal defense from its critique and concedes that the standard adversary ethic may be viable there. This paper criticizes that concession. I argue that the reasons most commonly given to distinguish the criminal from the civil do not …


The Public Defender, Robert R. Kimball May 1988

The Public Defender, Robert R. Kimball

Michigan Law Review

A Review of The Public Defender by Lisa J. McIntyre


"How Can You Defend Those People?" The Making Of A Criminal Lawyer, Michigan Law Review Feb 1985

"How Can You Defend Those People?" The Making Of A Criminal Lawyer, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of "How Can You Defend Those People?" The Making of a Criminal Lawyer by James S. Kunen


A Book Review With An Eye To Ethics, William H. Erickson Mar 1983

A Book Review With An Eye To Ethics, William H. Erickson

Michigan Law Review

A Review of The Best Defense by Alan M. Dershowitz


Confessions Of A Criminal Lawyer, Michigan Law Review Mar 1982

Confessions Of A Criminal Lawyer, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Confessions of a Criminal Lawyer by Seymour Wishman