Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
-
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Costs (1)
- Court costs (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Domestic Relations (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Equal Protection (1)
- Equality (1)
- Fees (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fines (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- General Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Indigent (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Juveniles (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Lawyers (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal Profession
The High Price Of Poverty: A Study Of How The Majority Of Current Court System Procedures For Collecting Court Costs And Fees, As Well As Fines, Have Failed To Adhere To Established Precedent And The Constitutional Guarantees They Advocate., Trevor J. Calligan
Trevor J Calligan
No abstract provided.
Foreword - A Decent Respect To The Opinions Of Mankind, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 207 (1992), Michael P. Seng
Foreword - A Decent Respect To The Opinions Of Mankind, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 207 (1992), Michael P. Seng
Michael P. Seng
No abstract provided.
Foreword, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 317 (2004), Samuel R. Olken
Foreword, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 317 (2004), Samuel R. Olken
Samuel R. Olken
No abstract provided.
Coming Off The Bench: Legal And Policy Implications Of Proposals To Allow Retired Justices To Sit By Designation On The Supreme Court, Lisa T. Mcelroy, Michael C. Dorf
Coming Off The Bench: Legal And Policy Implications Of Proposals To Allow Retired Justices To Sit By Designation On The Supreme Court, Lisa T. Mcelroy, Michael C. Dorf
Michael C. Dorf
In the fall of 2010, Senator Patrick Leahy introduced a bill that would have overridden a New Deal-era federal statute forbidding retired Justices from serving by designation on the Supreme Court of the United States. The Leahy bill would have authorized the Court to recall willing retired Justices to substitute for recused Justices. This Article uses the Leahy bill as a springboard for considering a number of important constitutional and policy questions, including whether the possibility of 4-4 splits justifies the substitution of a retired Justice for an active one; whether permitting retired Justices to substitute for recused Justices would …