Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Women In Legal Education Section, Elizabeth Defeis
Women In Legal Education Section, Elizabeth Defeis
UMKC Law Review
Elizabeth Defeis shares the history and her own experiences with The Women in Legal Education (WLE) Section of the AALS.
The Path Of Women In The Legal Academy: Gender, Race, And Culture, Melissa Tatum
The Path Of Women In The Legal Academy: Gender, Race, And Culture, Melissa Tatum
UMKC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Aals Section On Women In Legal Education Reflections: 2002-2011, Danne L. Johnson
Aals Section On Women In Legal Education Reflections: 2002-2011, Danne L. Johnson
UMKC Law Review
No abstract provided.
1992: A Year Of Women, Bravery, And Growth, Karen Czapanskiy
1992: A Year Of Women, Bravery, And Growth, Karen Czapanskiy
UMKC Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Unexpected Chair, Elizabeth Nowicki
A Section Memoir, Patricia Cain
A Section Memoir, Patricia Cain
UMKC Law Review
Patricia Cain discusses her experiences as a member and as Chair of the Women in Legel Education Section of the AALS.
The Aals Section On Women In Legal Education: The Past And The Future, Elizabeth M. Schneider
The Aals Section On Women In Legal Education: The Past And The Future, Elizabeth M. Schneider
UMKC Law Review
Elizabeth Schneider discusses her experiences as a member and as chair of the Women in Legal Education Section of the AALS and the importance of reflection on the history of the Section.
Women In Legal Education Iii, Marina Angel
Women In Legal Education Iii, Marina Angel
UMKC Law Review
Marina Angel shares her experiences with the Association of American Law Schools ("AALS") Section on Women in Legal Education. The first part of this article discusses her experience with the Section prior to becoming Chair, followed by a discussion of her experiences directly related to chairing the Section, and recommendations for future officers of the Section.
Introduction: Reflections Of Women In Legal Education: Stories From Four Decades Of Section Chairs, Linda Jellum, Nancy Levit
Introduction: Reflections Of Women In Legal Education: Stories From Four Decades Of Section Chairs, Linda Jellum, Nancy Levit
UMKC Law Review
An introduction is presented in which the editors discuss stories of women legal educators, who have served as Chair of the Association of American Law Schools' (AALS) Women in Legal Education Section in the U.S. and what that service meant to them over the years.
Reflections From An Era Of Breaking Glass - 1984-1998, Laura Rothstein
Reflections From An Era Of Breaking Glass - 1984-1998, Laura Rothstein
UMKC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regaining Momentum, Pat K. Chew
Memory Or Imagination: Reflections On The Section On Women In Legal Education, Joyce E. Mcconnell
Memory Or Imagination: Reflections On The Section On Women In Legal Education, Joyce E. Mcconnell
UMKC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Gendered Aspects Of Social Justice Work And Occupational Segregation In The Legal Academy: A Review Of 2003, Barbara Cox
The Gendered Aspects Of Social Justice Work And Occupational Segregation In The Legal Academy: A Review Of 2003, Barbara Cox
UMKC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly, Lisa R. Pruitt
Gender Integration And The Legal Academy: The Role Of The Aals Section On Women In Legal Education, Stephanie M. Wildman
Gender Integration And The Legal Academy: The Role Of The Aals Section On Women In Legal Education, Stephanie M. Wildman
UMKC Law Review
No abstract provided.
You Can't Go Holmes Again, Lumen N. Mulligan
You Can't Go Holmes Again, Lumen N. Mulligan
Faculty Works
Under the standard interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the so called Holmes test, pleading a federal cause of action is sufficient for finding federal question jurisdiction. In January 2012, the Supreme Court, in Mims v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC, recharacterized this standard test for § 1331 jurisdiction as one that considers whether “federal law creates [both] a private right of action and furnishes the substantive rules of decision.” In this first piece to address the Mims Court’s significant change to the § 1331 canon, I applaud its rights-inclusive holding. I contend that this rights-inclusive view rests upon a firmer …