Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Declaratory judgment (1)
- Federal Circuit (1)
- History (1)
-
- History and theory of intellectual property (1)
- Industrial and Intellectual Property (1)
- International Law: History (1)
- International News case (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Licensee (1)
- Monopoly (1)
- New test (1)
- Patent (1)
- Patent law (1)
- Patents (1)
- Reasonable Person Standard (1)
- Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 (1)
- Standard Setting (1)
- States (1)
- Subject matter jurisdiction (1)
- Territoriality (1)
- Trademark Law (1)
- Unfair competition (1)
- United States (1)
- World Trade Organization (1)
- “reasonable apprehension” test (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
International News V Associated Press: A Theme And Variations Over Four Days, Christopher Wadlow
International News V Associated Press: A Theme And Variations Over Four Days, Christopher Wadlow
Christopher Wadlow
A series of four classes at the University of Trier (Germany) for undergraduate law students, using the International News v Associated Press case 248 U.S. 215 (1918) to discuss some principles of unfair competition and copyright law, as well as some more fundamental doctrines from the common law, and American Constitutional law.
The Reasonable Person In Trademark Law, Laura A. Heymann
The Reasonable Person In Trademark Law, Laura A. Heymann
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Synopsis Of The Extraterritorial Protection Afforded By Section 337 As Compared To The Patent Act , Neil F. Duchez
Synopsis Of The Extraterritorial Protection Afforded By Section 337 As Compared To The Patent Act , Neil F. Duchez
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
Unlike Section 271 of the Patent Act of 1952, "[s]ection 337 is a trade law which is not necessarily limited by the principles of domestic patent law." When examined more closely, Section 337 of the U.S. Tariff Act of 1930 in effect provides a patentee more protection from infringing foreign activity than Section 271. Accordingly, in many situations involving foreign acts, it may be more advantageous to enforce a U.S. patent at the International Trade Commission ("Commission") as opposed to a federal district court. The analysis discussed infra more closely examines those situations and provides the history behind the intended …
The Making Of The Post-War Paradigm In American Intellectual Property Law, Steven Wilf
The Making Of The Post-War Paradigm In American Intellectual Property Law, Steven Wilf
Faculty Articles and Papers
During the New Deal period, intellectual property underwent a transformation. Copyright was recast from literary property to industrial property; trademark shifted from a common law tort of palming off to a regulatory regime for a mass consumer economy, and patent law was rethought to accommodate corporate invention. This essay begins by examining the advantages of looking at intellectual property as deeply situated in New Deal debates over political economy, and calls for a new history of intellectual property very different from conventional narratives moored in the introduction of new technologies. More broadly, it suggests that examining foundational past policy debates, …
Enhanced Protections For Geographical Indications Under Trips: Potential Conflicts Under The U.S. Constitutional And Statutory Regimes, David Snyder
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Sandisk Corp. V. Stmicroelectronics, Inc., Patrick R. Colsher
Sandisk Corp. V. Stmicroelectronics, Inc., Patrick R. Colsher
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Intellectual Property-Antitrust Interface, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
The Intellectual Property-Antitrust Interface, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
This historical overview examines the relationship between antitrust policy and intellectual property in the United States since 1890. Over most of this history, judges imagined far greater conflicts between antitrust policy and intellectual property rights than actually existed, or else relied on sweeping generalizations rather than close analysis. For example, they often assumed that the presence of an intellectual property right led to anticompetitive effects where there was no basis for finding any injury to competition at all. At the other extreme, they often concluded that an intellectual property right immunized seriously anticompetitive conduct even when the intellectual property statute …