Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Impeachment (2)
- Adarand Constructors v. Pena (1)
- Amendments (1)
- Appointments Clause (1)
- Attorney General (1)
-
- Bill of rights (1)
- Bork (Robert) (1)
- Brady bill (1)
- Brady handgun violence prevention act (1)
- Butchers Union (1)
- Canals (1)
- Citizens (1)
- City of boerne v. flores (1)
- Civil departments (1)
- Clinton (Bill) (1)
- Commonwealth v. Aves (1)
- Congressional power (1)
- Conservation (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional comparison (1)
- Constitutional convention (1)
- Constitutional history (1)
- Constitutional revision (1)
- Constitutionalism (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Court decisions (1)
- Courts (1)
- Cox (Archibald) (1)
- Crimes (1)
- Cruzan v. director missouri department of health (1)
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
An Original Model Of The Independent Counsel Statute, Ken Gormley
An Original Model Of The Independent Counsel Statute, Ken Gormley
Michigan Law Review
On Friday, October 19, 1973, President Richard M. Nixon took a risky step to de-fang the Watergate investigation that had become a "viper in the bosom" of his Presidency. The U.S. Court of Appeals had just directed him to tum over tape-recordings subpoenaed by Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox; these taperecordings might prove or disprove White House involvement in the Watergate cover-up. Rather than challenge this ruling, the President conceived a new plan. The White House would prepare summaries of the nine tape-recordings in question, which would be verified by Senator John Stennis, a seventy-two-year-old Democrat from Mississippi, working alone …
How Serious Is The Threat Of Impeachment? And To Whom?, Harold Baer Jr.
How Serious Is The Threat Of Impeachment? And To Whom?, Harold Baer Jr.
Michigan Law Review
While a slender volume, The Federal Impeachment Process offers the reader a variety of different insights on this topic, beginning with the debates at the Constitutional Convention and running to the modem-day practice of impeachment trials by committee rather than by the full senate. Impeachment is valuable reading, not just for those of us interested in American history, or those of us who are public officers of the United States, but for every American who wants to understand his or her morning newspaper better. Not only does it lift the veil of darkness surrounding the impeachment process, it provides a …
How To Constitutionalize International Law And Foreign Policy For The Benefit Of Civil Society?, Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann
How To Constitutionalize International Law And Foreign Policy For The Benefit Of Civil Society?, Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann
Michigan Journal of International Law
All societies have adopted rules in order to reconcile conflicts among the short-term interests of their citizens with their common long-term interests. All societies have learned that rule-making and rule-enforcement require government powers, as well as "checks and balances" against abuses of such powers. Constitutionalism has emerged as the most important human invention for protecting equal rights of the citizens against such abuses. It rests on the rationality of Ulysses who, when approaching the island of the sirens and knowing of their dangers, ordered his companions to bind him to the mast and not to release him under any circumstances.' …
Voting Rights, Eric Lane
Physician Assisted Suicide, Leon Friedman
The Declaration Of Independence In Constitutional Interpretation: A Selective History And Analysis, Charles H. Cosgrove
The Declaration Of Independence In Constitutional Interpretation: A Selective History And Analysis, Charles H. Cosgrove
University of Richmond Law Review
In 1845, antislavery constitutionalist Lysander Spooner argued that the Declaration of Independence was originally a legal constitution with a direct bearing on how one ought to interpret the status of slavery under the Constitution of 1787. In 1889, the congressional act establishing the states of North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, and Washington required that their state constitutions "not be repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and the Declaration of Independence," as if the two documents were of a piece. In 1995, attorney Christopher Darden argued to the jury in the O.J. Simpson criminal trial that slain victims Nicole …
Stop ... Go Directly To Jail, Do Not Pass Go, And Do Not Ask For A Notary, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 879 (1998), R. Jason Richards
Stop ... Go Directly To Jail, Do Not Pass Go, And Do Not Ask For A Notary, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 879 (1998), R. Jason Richards
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York's State Constitution In National Context, Robert F. Williams
New York's State Constitution In National Context, Robert F. Williams
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Is The New York Court Of Appeals Justified In Deviating From Federal Constitutional Interpretation?, Honorable Richard D. Simons
When Is The New York Court Of Appeals Justified In Deviating From Federal Constitutional Interpretation?, Honorable Richard D. Simons
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Constitutionalism" : The White Man's Ghost Dance, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 513 (1998), Robert C. Black
"Constitutionalism" : The White Man's Ghost Dance, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 513 (1998), Robert C. Black
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Without Justification: Misplaced Reliance On United Nations Security Council Resolutions For Presidential War Making, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 583 (1998), Timothy D. A. O'Hara
Without Justification: Misplaced Reliance On United Nations Security Council Resolutions For Presidential War Making, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 583 (1998), Timothy D. A. O'Hara
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.