Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Aboriginal lands (1)
- Amendments (1)
- Bill of rights (1)
- Canals (1)
- Civil departments (1)
-
- Condemnation (1)
- Conservation (1)
- Constitutional comparison (1)
- Constitutional convention (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutional revision (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Court decisions (1)
- Courts (1)
- Defense (1)
- Digests (1)
- Diritto (1)
- Education (1)
- Eminent domain (1)
- Endangered Species Act (1)
- Executive (1)
- Filosofia del diritto (1)
- Filosofia do Direito (1)
- Filosofia giuridica (1)
- Fishing (1)
- Housing (1)
- Hunting (1)
- Idaho (1)
- Independent Judiciary (1)
- Indian treaty rights (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 17 of 17
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
The Digests Of Pennsylvania, Joel Fishman
The Digests Of Pennsylvania, Joel Fishman
Joel Fishman
Pennsylvania has one of the largest collections of case law for which digests serve as an important research tool.
Administrative Agency Oversight Of Notarial Practice, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 857 (1998), John T. Henderson, Peter D. Kovach
Administrative Agency Oversight Of Notarial Practice, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 857 (1998), John T. Henderson, Peter D. Kovach
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Feminization Of The Office Of Notary Public: From Femme Covert To Notaire Covert, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 703 (1998), Deborah M. Thaw
The Feminization Of The Office Of Notary Public: From Femme Covert To Notaire Covert, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 703 (1998), Deborah M. Thaw
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stop ... Go Directly To Jail, Do Not Pass Go, And Do Not Ask For A Notary, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 879 (1998), R. Jason Richards
Stop ... Go Directly To Jail, Do Not Pass Go, And Do Not Ask For A Notary, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 879 (1998), R. Jason Richards
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Notarial Seal - The Last Vestige Of Notaries Past, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1998), Karla J. Elliot
The Notarial Seal - The Last Vestige Of Notaries Past, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1998), Karla J. Elliot
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Foreign Notarial Legal Services Monopoly: Why Should We Care, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 945 (1998), Pedro A. Malavet
The Foreign Notarial Legal Services Monopoly: Why Should We Care, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 945 (1998), Pedro A. Malavet
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
American Society Of Notaries: History Of A Legacy, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1001 (1998), Lisa K. Fisher
American Society Of Notaries: History Of A Legacy, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1001 (1998), Lisa K. Fisher
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Signed, Sealed, Delivered ... Disbarred - Notarial Misconduct By Attorneys, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1085 (1998), Christopher B. Young
Signed, Sealed, Delivered ... Disbarred - Notarial Misconduct By Attorneys, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1085 (1998), Christopher B. Young
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Promoting The Intermediate Benefits Of Strict Notary Regulation, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 819 (1998), Nancy Perkins Spyke
Promoting The Intermediate Benefits Of Strict Notary Regulation, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 819 (1998), Nancy Perkins Spyke
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York's State Constitution In National Context, Robert F. Williams
New York's State Constitution In National Context, Robert F. Williams
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Is The New York Court Of Appeals Justified In Deviating From Federal Constitutional Interpretation?, Honorable Richard D. Simons
When Is The New York Court Of Appeals Justified In Deviating From Federal Constitutional Interpretation?, Honorable Richard D. Simons
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Indian Tribal Rights And The National Forests: The Case Of The Aboriginal Lands Of The Nez Perce Tribe, Charles F. Wilkinson
Indian Tribal Rights And The National Forests: The Case Of The Aboriginal Lands Of The Nez Perce Tribe, Charles F. Wilkinson
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Public Official Role Of The Notary, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 651 (1998), Michael L. Closen
The Public Official Role Of The Notary, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 651 (1998), Michael L. Closen
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Requiring A Thumbprint For Notarized Transactions: The Battle Against Document Fraud, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 803 (1998), Vincent J. Gnoffo
Requiring A Thumbprint For Notarized Transactions: The Battle Against Document Fraud, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 803 (1998), Vincent J. Gnoffo
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The National Notary Association: A Historical Profile, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 971 (1998), Milton G. Valera
The National Notary Association: A Historical Profile, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 971 (1998), Milton G. Valera
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dalla Simbologia Giuridica A Una Filosofia Giuridica E Politica Simbolica ? Ovvero Il Diritto E I Sensi, Paulo Ferreira Da Cunha
Dalla Simbologia Giuridica A Una Filosofia Giuridica E Politica Simbolica ? Ovvero Il Diritto E I Sensi, Paulo Ferreira Da Cunha
Paulo Ferreira da Cunha
La prima conseguenza della nostra cultura giuridica dell'audizione che è anche cultura dell'oralità, del discorso e della scrittura (di tutto ciò che serve per parlare e fissare quello che può essere detto) è la volontaria atrofia degli altri sensi: il tatto, il gusto, l'olfatto e la vista. Il Diritto quasi non tocca le cose. Le concepisce mentalmente, le dice, però, anche se con i guanti deve toccare il corpo del delitto.
"Public Use" And The Independent Judiciary: Condemnation In An Interest-Group Perspective, Donald J. Kochan
"Public Use" And The Independent Judiciary: Condemnation In An Interest-Group Perspective, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
This Article reexamines the doctrine of public use under the Takings Clause and its ability to impede takings for private use through an application of public choice theory. It argues that the judicial validation of interest-group capture of the condemnation power through a relaxed public use standard in Takings Clause review can be explained by interest group politics and public choice theory and by institutional tendencies inherent in the independent judiciary. Legislators can sell the eminent domain power to special interests for almost any use, promising durability in the deal given the low probability that the judiciary will invalidate it …