Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Punishment (2)
- Bail (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Cass Sunstein (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
-
- Civil liberties (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Criminal cases (1)
- Criminal jurisprudence (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- England (1)
- Equality (1)
- Estes v. Hopp (1)
- Executions (1)
- FBI (1)
- Federal sentencing (1)
- Freedom (1)
- History (1)
- Juvenile Justice (1)
- Juveniles (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- McCleskey v. Kemp (1)
- Militia (1)
- National notoriety (1)
- Oliver Wendell Holmes (1)
- Parens Patriae (1)
- Political liberty (1)
- Public criminal trials (1)
- Racial discrimination (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Pretrial Publicity In Criminal Cases Of National Notoriety: Constructing A Remedy For The Remediless Wrong , Robert Hardaway, Douglas B. Tumminello
Pretrial Publicity In Criminal Cases Of National Notoriety: Constructing A Remedy For The Remediless Wrong , Robert Hardaway, Douglas B. Tumminello
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nuremberg - Fifty Years: Accountability And Responsibility, William G. Eckhardt
Nuremberg - Fifty Years: Accountability And Responsibility, William G. Eckhardt
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Revenge For The Condemned, Sara Sun Beale, Paul H. Haagen
Revenge For The Condemned, Sara Sun Beale, Paul H. Haagen
Michigan Law Review
A Review of V.A.C. Gatrell, The Hanging Tree: Execution and the English People 1770-1868
Quality Of Mercy Must Be Restrained, And Other Lessons In Learning To Love The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Quality Of Mercy Must Be Restrained, And Other Lessons In Learning To Love The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Faculty Publications
In the remarks that follow, I do four things. First, for those unfamiliar with the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, I begin by explaining briefly how the Guidelines work. Second, I endeavor to show why Judge Cabranes is wrong, absolutely wrong in declaring the Guidelines a failure, and mostly wrong in the specific criticisms he and others level against the Guidelines. Third, after jousting with Judge Cabranes a bit, I discuss some problems with the current federal sentencing system, most notably the sheer length of narcotics sentences. Finally, I comment briefly on some of the implications of the Guidelines, and the principles …
Preventing A Reign Of Terror: Civil Liberties Implications Of Terrorism Legislation, David B. Kopel, Joseph Olson
Preventing A Reign Of Terror: Civil Liberties Implications Of Terrorism Legislation, David B. Kopel, Joseph Olson
David B Kopel
Domestic terrorism is not a reason to abrogate constitutional rights, argues this 101-page paper, which discusses the 1996 omnibus federal terrorism bill, and other terror proposals. Topics include: scope of the terrorism problem; Britain's mistaken response to terror; use of the military in law enforcement; the Internet; militias; wiretapping; the FBI; and federalizing local crime.
Specific Agreements About Race: A Response To Professor Sunstein, Sheri Johnson
Specific Agreements About Race: A Response To Professor Sunstein, Sheri Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Death With Dignity: Aids And A Call For Legislation Securing The Right To Assisted Suicide, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 677 (1996), Jeremy A. Sitcoff
Death With Dignity: Aids And A Call For Legislation Securing The Right To Assisted Suicide, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 677 (1996), Jeremy A. Sitcoff
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Denial Of A State Constitutional Right To Bail In Juvenile Proceedings: The Need For Reassessment In Washington State, Kathleen A. Baldi
The Denial Of A State Constitutional Right To Bail In Juvenile Proceedings: The Need For Reassessment In Washington State, Kathleen A. Baldi
Seattle University Law Review
Article I, section 20 of the Washington Constitution states that "[a]ll persons charged with crimes shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses when the proof is evident, or the presumption great." Despite seemingly unequivocal language that this constitutional provision is applicable to "all persons," the Washington Supreme Court, in Estes v. Hopp, declared that juveniles do not have a constitutional right to bail. The Estes court engaged in little constitutional analysis, but instead, reasoned that juvenile proceedings are civil in nature and that article 1, section 20 applies only in criminal proceedings. Central to the Estes …
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Irrelevance Of The Intended To Prima Facie Culpability: Comment On Moore, Claire Oakes Finkelstein
The Irrelevance Of The Intended To Prima Facie Culpability: Comment On Moore, Claire Oakes Finkelstein
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Brain And Blame, Stephen J. Morse
An Epilogue To The Age Of Pound, Thomas A. Green
An Epilogue To The Age Of Pound, Thomas A. Green
Articles
Doubts about the reality of criminal offenders' autonomy have sometimes played a role in the movement to abolish, or greatly reduce the reach of, the sanction of capital punishment.