Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Brady v. Maryland (1)
- Brandeis (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Coronado oil (1)
-
- Corporal punishment (1)
- Cruel and unusual punishment (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Dialectic (1)
- Dissent (1)
- Doctrine (1)
- Due process (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Executions (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Notice and hearing (1)
- Overruling (1)
- Payne v. tennessee (1)
- Precedent (1)
- Stare decisis (1)
- Substantive justice (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Fifty Years Before Brady, Colin Starger
Fifty Years Before Brady, Colin Starger
All Faculty Scholarship
In marking the fiftieth anniversary of Brady v. Maryland, a fitting way to appreciate the historic significance of Justice Douglas’ opinion for the Court is to turn back the pages another fifty years. Brady’s profound contribution to our criminal justice system becomes apparent by considering the impoverished state of the Supreme Court’s due process doctrine as it stood a century ago. In the fifty years that led up to Brady, the Court confronted a series of racially and politically charged cases that forced constitutional soul searching about due process in the face of rank injustice. The story of the Court’s …
The Dialectic Of Stare Decisis Doctrine, Colin Starger
The Dialectic Of Stare Decisis Doctrine, Colin Starger
All Faculty Scholarship
In the United States Supreme Court, the concept of stare decisis operates as both metadoctrine and doctrine. On the one hand, stare decisis functions as a generally applicable presumption in favor of adherence to precedent. This presumption is metadoctrinal because it provides a generic argument against overruling that applies independently of the substantive context of any given case. On the other hand, when the Court considers overruling a particularly controversial precedent, it usually weighs the constraining force of stare decisis by invoking factors and tests announced in its own prior caselaw. In other words, the Court has precedent about when …
The Anomaly Of Executions: The Cruel And Unusual Punishments Clause In The 21st Century, John Bessler
The Anomaly Of Executions: The Cruel And Unusual Punishments Clause In The 21st Century, John Bessler
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article describes the anomaly of executions in the context of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Eighth Amendment jurisprudence. While the Supreme Court routinely reads the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause to protect prisoners from harm, the Court simultaneously interprets the Eighth Amendment to allow inmates to be executed. Corporal punishments short of death have long been abandoned in America’s penal system, yet executions — at least in a few locales, heavily concentrated in the South — persist. This Article, which seeks a principled and much more consistent interpretation of the Eighth Amendment, argues that executions should be declared unconstitutional as …