Legal History Commons^™

Penyampaian Informasi Mengenai Pemilik Manfaat Dari Korporasi Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dan Pendanaan Terorisme, Trisha Dayanara

"Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI

Indonesia’s government makes some efforts to be FATF’s member in order to be more accepted in international business. Therefore, Indonesia should comply to The FATF Recommendations, international standards on combating money laundering, and the financing of terrorism and proliferation. One of the government’s focus is on Recommendation 24 and 25 about Transparency and Beneficial Ownership of Legal Persons and Legal Arrangements. The implementation of Recommendation 24 and 25 can be seen at some Indonesia’s regulations. This article’s aim is to explain the regulations about transparency of beneficial ownership of corporation, using normative legal research by literature review. The conclusion of …

Transparansi Pengelolaan Bumd Di Provinsi Banten Dalam Rangka Optimalisasi Kontribusi Pada Perekonomian Daerah, Subhan Ashary Rezky Sanaky

"Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI

In an optimal and good economy area, BUMD management is very important. One of the good management of BUMD is through the principle of transparency. This principle is very important. Management using the Transparency Principle in the management of this BUMD must be carried out, so that the BUMD can achieve the objectives of establishing the BUMD, which is to support the economy of a region and also contribute to the regional economy. The importance of managing BUMD in a transparent manner through the principle of transparency is also the best way that can be done by BUMD to be …

Penyampaian Informasi Mengenai Pemilik Manfaat Dari Korporasi Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dan Pendanaan Terorisme, Trisha Dayanara

"Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI

Indonesia’s government makes some efforts to be FATF’s member in order to be more accepted in international business. Therefore, Indonesia should comply to The FATF Recommendations, international standards on combating money laundering, and the financing of terrorism and proliferation. One of the government’s focus is on Recommendation 24 and 25 about Transparency and Beneficial Ownership of Legal Persons and Legal Arrangements. The implementation of Recommendation 24 and 25 can be seen at some Indonesia’s regulations. This article’s aim is to explain the regulations about transparency of beneficial ownership of corporation, using normative legal research by literature review. The conclusion of …

Don't Change The Subject: How State Election Laws Can Nullify Ballot Questions, Cole Gordner

Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)

Procedural election laws regulate the conduct of state elections and provide for greater transparency and fairness in statewide ballots. These laws ensure that the public votes separately on incongruous bills and protects the electorate from uncertainties contained in omnibus packages. As demonstrated by a slew of recent court cases, however, interest groups that are opposed to the objective of a ballot question are utilizing these election laws with greater frequency either to prevent a state electorate from voting on an initiative or to overturn a ballot question that was already decided in the initiative’s favor. This practice is subverting the …

O’Neill, Oh O’Neill, Wherefore Art Thou O’Neill: Defining And Cementing The Requirements For Asserting Deliberative Process Privilege, Andrew Scott

Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)

The government may invoke the deliberative process privilege to protect the communications of government officials involving policy-driven decision-making. The privilege protects communications made before policy makers act upon the policy decision to allow government officials to speak candidly when deciding a course of action without fear of their words being used against them.

This privilege is not absolute and courts recognize the legitimate countervailing interest the public has in transparency. The Supreme Court in United States v. Reynolds held that someone with control over the protected information should personally consider the privilege before asserting it but did not provide definitive …