Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Common Law (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Disability Law (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Legal Remedies (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Centering Women In Prisoners' Rights Litigation, Amber Baylor
Centering Women In Prisoners' Rights Litigation, Amber Baylor
Faculty Scholarship
This Article consciously employs both a dignity rights-based framing and methodology. Dignity rights are those rights that are based on the Kantian assertion of “inalienable human worth.”29 This framework for defining rights spans across a number of disciplines, including medicine and human rights law.30 Disciplinary sanctions like solitary confinement or forced medication might be described as anathema to human dignity because of their degrading effect on an individual’s emotional and social well-being.
This Article relies on first-person oral histories where possible. Bioethics scholar Claire Hooker argues that including narratives in work on dignity rights “is both a moral and an …
When Courts Run Amuck: A Book Review Of Unequal: How America's Courts Undermine Discrimination Law By Sandra F. Sperino And Suja A. Thomas (Oxford 2017), Theresa M. Beiner
When Courts Run Amuck: A Book Review Of Unequal: How America's Courts Undermine Discrimination Law By Sandra F. Sperino And Suja A. Thomas (Oxford 2017), Theresa M. Beiner
Texas A&M Law Review
In Unequal: How America’s Courts Undermine Discrimination Law (“Unequal”), law professors Sandra F. Sperino and Suja A. Thomas provide a point-by-point analysis of how the federal courts’ interpretations of federal anti-discrimination laws have undermined their efficacy to provide relief to workers whose employers have allegedly engaged in discrimination. The cases’ results are consistently pro-employer, even while the Supreme Court of the United States—a court not known for being particularly pro-plaintiff—has occasionally ruled in favor of plaintiff employees. The authors suggest some reasons for this apparent anti-plaintiff bias among the federal courts, although they do not settle on a particular reason …
Disseisin, Doubt, And Debate: Adverse Possession Scholarship In The United States (1881-1986), John Lovett
Disseisin, Doubt, And Debate: Adverse Possession Scholarship In The United States (1881-1986), John Lovett
Texas A&M Law Review
Property law scholars in the United States have discussed the doctrine of adverse possession for more than a century. Indeed, ever since American property law scholars began to write property law treatises, formalize property law courses in modern law schools, publish property specific articles in law reviews, and publish property law case books, adverse possession has served as a staple of property law discourse. This Article examines how property law scholars think about and discuss adverse possession. It explores how adverse possession talk has changed—and not changed—over time. In other words, this Article examines both the substance and rhetoric of …