Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (2)
- Legal history (2)
- Administrative procedure (1)
- Administrative state (1)
- Campaign finance (1)
-
- Civil liberties law (1)
- Comparative law (1)
- Corporate Contribution Ban (1)
- Corporate contribution limit (1)
- Corporate contribution restriction (1)
- Corporate money (1)
- Due process (1)
- Fair play (1)
- Harvard Law Review (1)
- Military history (1)
- Shareholder protection (1)
- Tillman Act (1)
- Valparaiso University Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
A War For Liberty: On The Law Of Conscientious Objection, Jeremy K. Kessler
A War For Liberty: On The Law Of Conscientious Objection, Jeremy K. Kessler
Faculty Scholarship
One common understanding of the Second World War is that it was a contest between liberty and tyranny. For many at the time – and for still more today – ‘liberty’ meant the rule of law: government constrained by principle, procedure, and most of all, individual rights. For those states that claimed to represent this rule-of-law tradition, total war presented enormous challenges, even outright contradictions. How would these states manage to square the governmental imperatives of military emergency with the legal protections and procedures essential to preserving the ancient ‘liberty of the subject’? This question could be and was asked …
The Uncertain Future Of The Corporate Contribution Ban, Richard Briffault
The Uncertain Future Of The Corporate Contribution Ban, Richard Briffault
Faculty Scholarship
Concern about the role of corporate money in democracy has been a longstanding theme in American politics. In the late nineteenth century, the states began to adopt laws restricting the use of corporate funds in elections. The first permanent federal campaign finance law – the Tillman Act of 1907 – targeted corporations by prohibiting federally-chartered corporations from making contributions in any election and prohibiting all corporations from making contributions in federal elections. Subsequently amended, continued, and strengthened by the Federal Corrupt Practices Act of 1925, the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947, the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, and the Bipartisan …
The Struggle For Administrative Legitimacy, Jeremy K. Kessler
The Struggle For Administrative Legitimacy, Jeremy K. Kessler
Faculty Scholarship
Nearly forty years ago, Professor James 0. Freedman described the American administrative state as haunted by a "recurrent sense of crisis." "Each generation has tended to define the crisis in its own terms," and "each generation has fashioned solutions responsive to the problems it has perceived." Yet "a strong and persisting challenge to the basic legitimacy of the administrative process" always returns, in a new guise, to trouble the next generation. On this account, the American people remain perennially unconvinced that administrative decisionmaking is "appropriate, proper, and just," entitled to respect and obedience "by virtue of who made the decision" …