Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Banking and Finance Law (2)
- Bankruptcy Law (2)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Economics (2)
-
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Law and Psychology (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal Biography (2)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- Securities Law (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Accounting Law (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Admiralty (1)
- Agency (1)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- Air and Space Law (1)
- Animal Law (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Price, Path & Pride: Third-Party Closing Opinion Practice Among U.S. Lawyers (A Preliminary Investigation), Jonathan C. Lipson
Price, Path & Pride: Third-Party Closing Opinion Practice Among U.S. Lawyers (A Preliminary Investigation), Jonathan C. Lipson
ExpressO
This article presents the first in-depth exploration of third-party closing opinions, a common but curious – and potentially troubling -- feature of U.S. business law practice. Third-party closing opinions are letters delivered at the closing of most large transactions by the attorney for one party (e.g., the borrower) to the other party (e.g., the lender) offering limited assurance that the transaction will have legal force and effect.
Hundreds, if not thousands, of legal opinions are delivered every week. Yet, lawyers often complain that they create needless risk and cost, and produce little benefit. Closing opinions thus pose a basic question: …
Rediscovering Williston, Mark L. Movsesian
Rediscovering Williston, Mark L. Movsesian
Faculty Publications
This Article is an intellectual history of classical contracts scholar Samuel Williston. Professor Movsesian argues that the conventional account of Williston's jurisprudence presents an incomplete and distorted picture. While much of Williston's work can strike a contemporary reader as arid and conceptual, there are strong elements of pragmatism as well. Williston insists that doctrine be justified in terms of real-world consequences, maintains that rules can have only presumptive force, and offers institutional explanations for judicial restraint. As a result, his scholarship shares more in common with today's new formalism than commonly supposed. Even the under-theorized quality of Williston's scholarship—to contemporary …
Joseph Baxendale, James J. Fishman
Joseph Baxendale, James J. Fishman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The defendant in the great case of Hadley v. Baxendale is Joseph Baxendale, managing partner of Pickford and Co., the common carrier that delayed the delivery of the Hadley's shaft. Baxendale was named the defendant, because Pickfords was a partnership and did not incorporate until 1901. Joseph Baxendale was born in 1785, the son of a Lancastershire surgeon. In 1806, he moved to London, where he worked for a wholesale linen draper. Later, he became a partner in that firm, and developed the managerial and accounting skills that would serve him so well at Pickfords.