Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 14th Amendment (1)
- 1983 (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Bivens (1)
-
- Civil rights (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Establishment Clause (1)
- FRAP 32.1 (1)
- Familial privacy (1)
- Federal rules of appellate procedure (1)
- Free Exercise Clause (1)
- Fundamental right (1)
- Gender (1)
- Justiciability (1)
- Precedent (1)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Qualified immunity (1)
- Reproductive freedom (1)
- Right to Privacy (1)
- Right to privacy (1)
- Separation of Powers (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Unpublished (1)
- Women (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Foreword: New Supreme Court Cases: Duquesne Law Faculty Explains, Wilson Huhn
Foreword: New Supreme Court Cases: Duquesne Law Faculty Explains, Wilson Huhn
Law Faculty Publications
On September 30, 2022, several members of the faculty of the Thomas R. Kline School of Law of Duquesne University presented a Continuing Legal Education program, New Supreme Court Cases: Duquesne Law Faculty Explains, reviewing these developments. Duquesne Law Review graciously invited the faculty panel to contribute their analysis of these cases from the Supreme Court's 2021- 2022 term for inclusion in this symposium issue of the Law Review.
Privacy: Pre- And Post-Dobbs, Rona Kaufman
Privacy: Pre- And Post-Dobbs, Rona Kaufman
Law Faculty Publications
The United States Supreme Court has interpreted the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to include a fundamental right to familial privacy. The exact contours of that right were developed by the Court from 1923 until 2015. In 2022, with its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, the Supreme Court abruptly changed course and held that the right to terminate a pregnancy is no longer part of the right to privacy previously recognized by the Court. This essay seeks to place Dobbs in the context of the Court’s family privacy cases in an effort to understand the Court’s …
Clear As Mud: How The Uncertain Precedential Status Of Unpublished Opinions Muddles Qualified Immunity Determinations, David R. Cleveland
Clear As Mud: How The Uncertain Precedential Status Of Unpublished Opinions Muddles Qualified Immunity Determinations, David R. Cleveland
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.