Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Article 17 (1)
- Article 22 (1)
- Body (1)
- Brandenburg (1)
- Cargo (1)
-
- Censorship (1)
- Clear and Present Danger (1)
- Corpse (1)
- Emotional Distress (1)
- Fairness Doctrine (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Free Speech (1)
- Government Suppression (1)
- Hate Speech (1)
- Human Remains (1)
- Incitement (1)
- Intentional (1)
- John Stuart Mill (1)
- Liability Limit (1)
- Montreal Convention (1)
- Negligence (1)
- The Smith Act (1)
- Tolerance (1)
- Tort (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Death Be Not Strange. The Montreal Convention’S Mislabeling Of Human Remains As Cargo And Its Near Unbreakable Liability Limits, Christopher Ogolla
Death Be Not Strange. The Montreal Convention’S Mislabeling Of Human Remains As Cargo And Its Near Unbreakable Liability Limits, Christopher Ogolla
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
This article discusses Article 22 of the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air (“The Montreal Convention”) and its impact on the transportation of human remains. The Convention limits carrier liability to a sum of 19 Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) per kilogram in the case of destruction, loss, damage or delay of part of the cargo or of any object contained therein. Transportation of human remains falls under Article 22 which forecloses any recovery for pain and suffering unaccompanied by physical injury. This Article finds fault with this liability limit. The Article notes that if …
Whose Market Is It Anyway? A Philosophy And Law Critique Of The Supreme Court’S Free-Speech Absolutism, Spencer Bradley
Whose Market Is It Anyway? A Philosophy And Law Critique Of The Supreme Court’S Free-Speech Absolutism, Spencer Bradley
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
In the wake of Charlottesville, the rise of the alt-right, and campus controversies, the First Amendment has fallen into public scrutiny. Historically, the First Amendment’s “marketplace of ideas” has been a driving source of American political identity; since Brandenburg v. Ohio, the First Amendment protects all speech from government interference unless it causes incitement. The marketplace of ideas allows for the good and the bad ideas to enter American society and ultimately allows the people to decide their own course.
Yet, is the First Amendment truly a tool of social progress? Initially, the First Amendment curtailed war-time dissidents and …