Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (2)
- Brady v. Maryland (1)
- Brandeis (1)
- Ceremonial deism (1)
- Compromise (1)
-
- Constitutional interpretation (1)
- Coronado oil (1)
- Dialectic (1)
- Dissent (1)
- Doctrine (1)
- Due process (1)
- Endorsement test (1)
- Establishment Clause (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Gender (1)
- George Washington (1)
- Government (1)
- James Madison (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Lawyers (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Legal profession (1)
- Myra Bradwell (1)
- Non-sectarian (1)
- Notice and hearing (1)
- Originalism (1)
- Overruling (1)
- Payne v. tennessee (1)
- Precedent (1)
- Religious freedom (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
The Original Meaning Of "God": Using The Language Of The Framing Generation To Create A Coherent Establishment Clause Jurisprudence, Michael I. Meyerson
The Original Meaning Of "God": Using The Language Of The Framing Generation To Create A Coherent Establishment Clause Jurisprudence, Michael I. Meyerson
All Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s attempt to create a standard for evaluating whether the Establishment Clause is violated by religious governmental speech, such as the public display of the Ten Commandments or the Pledge of Allegiance, is a total failure. The Court’s Establishment Clause jurisprudence has been termed “convoluted,” “a muddled mess,” and “a polite lie.” Unwilling to either allow all governmental religious speech or ban it entirely, the Court is in need of a coherent standard for distinguishing the permissible from the unconstitutional. Thus far, no Justice has offered such a standard.
A careful reading of the history of the framing …
Fifty Years Before Brady, Colin Starger
Fifty Years Before Brady, Colin Starger
All Faculty Scholarship
In marking the fiftieth anniversary of Brady v. Maryland, a fitting way to appreciate the historic significance of Justice Douglas’ opinion for the Court is to turn back the pages another fifty years. Brady’s profound contribution to our criminal justice system becomes apparent by considering the impoverished state of the Supreme Court’s due process doctrine as it stood a century ago. In the fifty years that led up to Brady, the Court confronted a series of racially and politically charged cases that forced constitutional soul searching about due process in the face of rank injustice. The story of the Court’s …
The Dialectic Of Stare Decisis Doctrine, Colin Starger
The Dialectic Of Stare Decisis Doctrine, Colin Starger
All Faculty Scholarship
In the United States Supreme Court, the concept of stare decisis operates as both metadoctrine and doctrine. On the one hand, stare decisis functions as a generally applicable presumption in favor of adherence to precedent. This presumption is metadoctrinal because it provides a generic argument against overruling that applies independently of the substantive context of any given case. On the other hand, when the Court considers overruling a particularly controversial precedent, it usually weighs the constraining force of stare decisis by invoking factors and tests announced in its own prior caselaw. In other words, the Court has precedent about when …
Gender Bias: Continuing Challenges And Opportunities, Rebecca Korzec
Gender Bias: Continuing Challenges And Opportunities, Rebecca Korzec
All Faculty Scholarship
In 1873 the U.S. Supreme Court denied Myra Bradwell the right to practice law, holding "the paramount destiny and mission of women are to fulfill the noble and benign office of wife and mother." Now, just slightly more a century later, two women sit on the Supreme Court, and almost half of all law students and law school faculty are women.