Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Bowers v. Hardwick (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminalize (1)
-
- Due process (1)
- Emotion (1)
- Emotional (1)
- Epistemology (1)
- Eugenics; Disability Law; Health Care;History (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Feminine (1)
- Feminist (1)
- Griswold v. Connecticut (1)
- Homosexual sodomy (1)
- Infringement (1)
- Judeo-Christian ethics (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Lawrence v. Texas (1)
- Legal Analysis and Writing (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Martin Schwartz (1)
- Narrative (1)
- Narratology (1)
- Nussbaum (1)
- Personal autonomy (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Lawrence V. Texas: The Decision And Its Implications For The Future, Martin A. Schwartz
Lawrence V. Texas: The Decision And Its Implications For The Future, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Race And Gender In The Law Review, Cynthia Grant Bowman, Dorothy E. Roberts, Leonard S. Rubinowitz
Race And Gender In The Law Review, Cynthia Grant Bowman, Dorothy E. Roberts, Leonard S. Rubinowitz
Cynthia Grant Bowman
No abstract provided.
Punitive Injunctions, Nirej S. Sekhon
When Harvard Said No To Eugenics: The J. Ewing Mears Bequest, 1927, Paul A. Lombardo
When Harvard Said No To Eugenics: The J. Ewing Mears Bequest, 1927, Paul A. Lombardo
Faculty Publications By Year
James Ewing Mears (1838-1919) was a founding member of the Philadelphia Academy of Surgery. His 1910 book, The Problem of Race Betterment, laid the groundwork for later authors to explore the uses of surgical sterilization as a eugenic measure. Mears left $60,000 in his will to Harvard University to support the teaching of eugenics. Although numerous eugenic activists were on the Harvard faculty, and who of its Presidents were also associated with the eugenics movement, Harvard refused the Mears gift. The bequest was eventually awarded to Jefferson Medical College in Philadelphia. This article explains why Harvard turned its back …
Tell Us A Story, But Don't Make It A Good One: Resolving The Confusion Regarding Emotional Stories And Federal Rule Of Evidence 403, Cathren Page
Cathren Page
Abstract: Tell Us a Story, But Don’t Make It A Good One: Resolving the Confusion Regarding Emotional Stories and Federal Rule of Evidence 403 by Cathren Koehlert-Page Courts need to reword their opinions regarding Rule 403 to address the tension between the advice to tell an emotionally evocative story at trial and the notion that evidence can be excluded if it is too emotional. In the murder mystery Mystic River, Dave Boyle is kidnapped in the beginning. The audience feels empathy for Dave who as an adult becomes one of the main suspects in the murder of his friend Jimmy’s …