Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (1)
- Chicago School (1)
- Civil pleading (1)
- Code pleading (1)
- Common law (1)
-
- Essential facts (1)
- FRCP 8(a) (1)
- FRCrP 7(c) (1)
- Fact pleading (1)
- Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) (1)
- Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(c) (1)
- Federal Rules (1)
- Indictment (1)
- Meaning of Rule 7(c) (1)
- Monopoly (1)
- Neo-Brandeis (1)
- Pleading history (1)
- Pleading requirements (1)
- Relationship between civil & criminal pleading (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Resendiz-Ponce (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Addressing The Divisions In Antitrust Policy, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
Addressing The Divisions In Antitrust Policy, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
This is the text of an interview conducted in writing by Professor A. Douglas Melamed, Stanford Law School.
A Formulaic Recitation Will Not Do: Why The Federal Rules Demand More Detail In Criminal Pleading, Charles Eric Hintz
A Formulaic Recitation Will Not Do: Why The Federal Rules Demand More Detail In Criminal Pleading, Charles Eric Hintz
All Faculty Scholarship
When a plaintiff files a civil lawsuit in federal court, her complaint must satisfy certain minimum standards. Specifically, under the prevailing understanding of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), a complaint must plead sufficient factual matter to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face, rather than mere conclusory statements. Given the significantly higher stakes involved in criminal cases, one might think that an even more robust requirement would exist in that context. But in fact a weaker pleading standard reigns. Under the governing interpretation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(c), indictments that simply parrot the …