Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Commander in Chief discretion (1)
- Gender and law (1)
- Human trafficking (1)
- Japan (1)
- Korea (1)
-
- Law of War (1)
- Paquete Habana (1)
- Rules of engagement (1)
- Safe harbor (1)
- Sex crimes (1)
- Sexual slavery (1)
- Slavery (1)
- T. Nelson Collier (1)
- Tarros S.p.A. v. United States (1)
- Twilight zone (1)
- U.S. Navy (1)
- Victims (1)
- War and politics (1)
- War crimes (1)
- War powers (1)
- Wartime actions (1)
- Women (1)
- World War II (1)
- Wu Tien Li-Shou v. United States (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
The Error Of The Paquete Habana: U.S. Naval Forces In The Safe Harbor Of Commander-In-Chief Discretion And The Law Of War, T. Nelson Collier
The Error Of The Paquete Habana: U.S. Naval Forces In The Safe Harbor Of Commander-In-Chief Discretion And The Law Of War, T. Nelson Collier
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming.
The Fallacy Of Contract In Sexual Slavery: A Response To Ramseyer's "Contracting For Sex In The Pacific War", Yong-Shik Lee, Natsu Taylor Saito, Jonathan Todres
The Fallacy Of Contract In Sexual Slavery: A Response To Ramseyer's "Contracting For Sex In The Pacific War", Yong-Shik Lee, Natsu Taylor Saito, Jonathan Todres
Michigan Journal of International Law
Over seven decades have passed since the end of the Second World War, but the trauma from the cruelest war in human history continues today, perpetuated by denial of responsibility for the war crimes committed and unjust attempts to rewrite history at the expense of dignity, life, and justice for the victims of the most serious human rights violations. The latest such attempt is a troubling recharacterization of the sexual slavery enforced by Japan during the Second World War as a legitimate contractual arrangement. A recent paper authored by J. Mark Ramseyer, entitled “Contracting for Sex in the Pacific War,” …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents