Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Brown v. Board of Education (3)
- Affirmative Action (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Education (1)
- Equal protection (1)
-
- Ethnic conflict (1)
- Ethnic groups (1)
- Group rights (1)
- Grutter v. Bollinger (1)
- Harlan (1)
- History (1)
- International legal personality (1)
- International morality (1)
- Peoples in international law (1)
- Prejudice (1)
- Public education (1)
- Race (1)
- Race relations (1)
- Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1)
- Segregation (1)
- Separate but Equal (1)
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire (1)
- Treaty of Westphalia (1)
- Virginia (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Reflections On Brown And The Future, Oliver W. Hill Sr.
Reflections On Brown And The Future, Oliver W. Hill Sr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Call To Leadership: The Future Of Race Relations In Virginia, Rodney A. Smolla
A Call To Leadership: The Future Of Race Relations In Virginia, Rodney A. Smolla
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ethnic Groups And International Law: A Status Report On International Legal Personality At The Beginning Of The New Century, Steven M. Schneebaum
Ethnic Groups And International Law: A Status Report On International Legal Personality At The Beginning Of The New Century, Steven M. Schneebaum
Human Rights & Human Welfare
A review of:
International Law and Ethnic Conflict edited by David Wippman. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998. 368pp.
The Journey From Brown V. Board Of Education To Grutter V. Bollinger: From Racial Assimilation To Diversity, Harry T. Edwards
The Journey From Brown V. Board Of Education To Grutter V. Bollinger: From Racial Assimilation To Diversity, Harry T. Edwards
Michigan Law Review
Fifty years ago, in Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court confronted a precise and straightforward question: "Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other 'tangible' factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities?" The Court's answer was precise and straightforward: "We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs ... are, by reason of the segregation complained of, …