Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Bioethics (1)
- Brain (1)
- Cocaine (1)
- Controlled substance (1)
- Criminal possession (1)
-
- Criminal responsibility (1)
- Decision making (1)
- District Courts (1)
- EEG (1)
- Elyssa Lane (1)
- Emotion (1)
- Evidence (1)
- FMRI (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
- Injury (1)
- Judging (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Kelley (1)
- Lane (1)
- Law and neuroscience (1)
- Lie detection (1)
- Memory (1)
- Neuroethics (1)
- Neurolaw (1)
- New York Constitution (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Probable cause (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Psychopathy (1)
- Punishment (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Apellate Division, Third Department, People V. Kelley, Elyssa Lane
Apellate Division, Third Department, People V. Kelley, Elyssa Lane
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Punitive Injunctions, Nirej S. Sekhon
Judicial Influence And The United States Federal District Courts: A Case Study, Justin R. Hickerson
Judicial Influence And The United States Federal District Courts: A Case Study, Justin R. Hickerson
Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects
No abstract provided.
Law And Neuroscience: Recommendations Submitted To The President's Bioethics Commission, Owen D. Jones, Richard J. Bonnie, B. J. Casey, Andre Davis, David L. Faigman, Morris Hoffman, Read Montague, Stephen J. Morse, Marcus E. Raichle, Jennifer A. Richeson, Elizabeth Scott, Laurence Steinberg, Kim Taylor-Thompson, Anthony Wagner, Gideon Yaffe
Law And Neuroscience: Recommendations Submitted To The President's Bioethics Commission, Owen D. Jones, Richard J. Bonnie, B. J. Casey, Andre Davis, David L. Faigman, Morris Hoffman, Read Montague, Stephen J. Morse, Marcus E. Raichle, Jennifer A. Richeson, Elizabeth Scott, Laurence Steinberg, Kim Taylor-Thompson, Anthony Wagner, Gideon Yaffe
All Faculty Scholarship
President Obama charged the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues to identify a set of core ethical standards in the neuroscience domain, including the appropriate use of neuroscience in the criminal-justice system. The Commission, in turn, called for comments and recommendations. The MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience submitted a consensus statement, published here, containing 16 specific recommendations. These are organized within three main themes: 1) what steps should be taken to enhance the capacity of the criminal justice system to make sound decisions regarding the admissibility and weight of neuroscientific evidence?; 2) to what extent …