Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Agency (1)
- Agents (1)
- America (1)
- American (1)
- Analytical positivism (1)
-
- Antebellum (1)
- Aquinas (1)
- Austin (1)
- Bentham (1)
- Cicero (1)
- Civil War (1)
- Distribution of social wealth (1)
- Doctrine of Good Faith Purchase (1)
- Dworkin (1)
- Economic efficiency (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Fuller (Lon) (1)
- Good Faith Purchase (1)
- Hart (1)
- Illegitimate goods (1)
- Judge (1)
- Judicial (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and politics (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Marketplace (1)
- Markets overt (1)
- Medical jurisprudence (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Markets Overt, Voidable Titles, And Feckless Agents: Judges And Efficiency In The Antebellum Doctrine Of Good Faith Purchase, Harold R. Weinberg
Markets Overt, Voidable Titles, And Feckless Agents: Judges And Efficiency In The Antebellum Doctrine Of Good Faith Purchase, Harold R. Weinberg
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
In considering American common law doctrines shaped during the nineteenth century, commentators have advanced differing theories on the primary judicial criteria employed by judges. Recent studies have argued that these doctrines reflect a criterion of economic efficiency. This work has been criticized for its failure to explain why there seems to be a correlation between efficiency and these decision rules or why judges might have preferred efficiency over other decisional criteria. Other studies have proposed that many judicial doctrines announced before the Civil War were intended to facilitate or ratify major shifts in the distribution of social wealth. This article …
Lon Fuller And Substantive Natural Law, Anthony D'Amato
Lon Fuller And Substantive Natural Law, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
I will contend that Fuller's secular or "procedural" natural law, as described by Moffat, does not cover the theoretical position that could be occupied by a substantive natural lawyer, that such a theoretical position is viable today, and that there are some key elements in Fuller's theory that actually conflict with substantive natural law and might therefore be criticized from that perspective.
Pragmatic Instrumentalism In Twentieth Century American Legal Thought—A Synthesis And Critique Of Our Dominant General Theory About Law And Its Use, Robert S. Summers
Pragmatic Instrumentalism In Twentieth Century American Legal Thought—A Synthesis And Critique Of Our Dominant General Theory About Law And Its Use, Robert S. Summers
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.