Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- and Voluntariness. (1)
- 9/11 (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- African-Americans (1)
- Ashcraft (1)
-
- Biography (1)
- Bram (1)
- Brown (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Coercive Interrogation (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Constitutional Protections for Aliens (1)
- Constitutional Rights in Interrogation (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law Jurisprudence (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Cumulative Mistreatment (1)
- Deep South (1)
- Detainees (1)
- Eisentrager (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- General Law (1)
- Hamdan (1)
- Hamdi (1)
- Hybrid Paradigm (1)
- International Law (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Interrogation Of Detainees: Extending A Hand Or A Boot?, Amos N. Guiora
Interrogation Of Detainees: Extending A Hand Or A Boot?, Amos N. Guiora
ExpressO
The so called “war on terror” provides the Bush administration with a unique opportunity to both establish clear guidelines for the interrogation of detainees and to make a forceful statement about American values. How the government chooses to act can promote either an ethical commitment to the norms of civil society, or an attitude analogous to Toby Keith’s “American Way,” where Keith sings that “you’ll be sorry that you messed with the USofA, ‘Cuz we’ll put a boot in your ass, It’s the American Way.”
No aspect of the “war on terrorism” more clearly addresses this balance than coercive interrogation. …
Jutstice Kennedy And The Environment: Property, States' Rights, And The Search For Nexus, Michael Blumm
Jutstice Kennedy And The Environment: Property, States' Rights, And The Search For Nexus, Michael Blumm
ExpressO
Justice Anthony Kennedy, now clearly the pivot of the Roberts Court, is the Court’s crucial voice in environmental and natural resources law cases. Kennedy’s central role was never more evident than in the two most celebrated environmental and natural resources law cases of 2006: Kelo v. New London and Rapanos v. U.S., since he supplied the critical vote in both: upholding local use of the condemnation power for economic development under certain circumstances, and affirming federal regulatory authority over wetlands which have a significant nexus to navigable waters. In each case Kennedy’s sole concurrence was outcome determinative.
Justice Kennedy has …