Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Economics (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Arrow Theorem (1)
- Coase (1)
-
- Collective irrationality (1)
- Condorcet cycling (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Corporate Finance (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Democractic decisionmaking (1)
- Economic History (1)
- General Law (1)
- History (1)
- Impossibility Theorem (1)
- Institutionalism (1)
- Interpersonal Comparison of Utilities (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Justice (1)
- Kenneth J. Arrow (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Marginalism (1)
- Neoclassical Economics (1)
- Politics (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Social Choice Theory (1)
- Transactions Costs (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
The Marginalist Revolution In Corporate Finance: 1880-1965, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
The Marginalist Revolution In Corporate Finance: 1880-1965, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries fundamental changes in economic thought revolutionized the theory of corporate finance, leading to changes in its legal regulation. The changes were massive, and this branch of financial analysis and law became virtually unrecognizable to those who had practiced it earlier. The source of this revision was the marginalist, or neoclassical, revolution in economic thought. The classical theory had seen corporate finance as an historical, relatively self-executing inquiry based on the classical theory of value and administered by common law courts. By contrast, neoclassical value theory was forward looking and as a result …
Collective Choice, Justin Schwartz
Collective Choice, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
This short nontechnical article reviews the Arrow Impossibility Theorem and its implications for rational democratic decisionmaking. In the 1950s, economist Kenneth J. Arrow proved that no method for producing a unique social choice involving at least three choices and three actors could satisfy four seemingly obvious constraints that are practically constitutive of democratic decisionmaking. Any such method must violate such a constraint and risks leading to disturbingly irrational results such and Condorcet cycling. I explain the theorem in plain, nonmathematical language, and discuss the history, range, and prospects of avoiding what seems like a fundamental theoretical challenge to the possibility …
Coase, Institutionalism, And The Origins Of Law And Economics, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
Coase, Institutionalism, And The Origins Of Law And Economics, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
Ronald Coase merged two traditions in economics, marginalism and institutionalism. Neoclassical economics in the 1930s was characterized by an abstract conception of marginalism and frictionless resource movement. Marginal analysis did not seek to uncover the source of individual human preference or value, but accepted preference as given. It treated the business firm in the same way, focusing on how firms make market choices, but saying little about their internal workings.
“Institutionalism” historically refers to a group of economists who wrote mainly in the 1920s and 1930s. Their place in economic theory is outside the mainstream, but they have found new …