Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Advisory opinions (1)
- Articles (1)
- Basics of US Criimiinal Justice System (1)
- Civil Law (1)
-
- Civil Rights (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Justice (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Doctrine of precedent (1)
- Early American history (1)
- Free speech (1)
- General Law (1)
- Iqbal (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial accountability (1)
- Judicial discipline (1)
- Judicial independence (1)
- Judicial reform (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Plausibility pleading (1)
- Practice and Procedure (1)
- Professional Ethics (1)
- Rule of law (1)
- Stare decisis (1)
- Supreme court (1)
- Supreme court justices (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
The Basics Of Us Criminal Justice System, Bethel G.A Erastus-Obilo
The Basics Of Us Criminal Justice System, Bethel G.A Erastus-Obilo
Bethel G.A Erastus-Obilo
The criminal justice system is complex. It is also bureaucratic by design and has evolved over the years from simple unstructured peacekeeping units to the large complex crime-fighting system that it is today. Many of those who work within it find it challenging and unwieldy. Many of those who are accused of an offense find it confusing and intimidating. This goes for citizens and foreigners whether they are competent in the English language or not. For most members of ethnic minority groups, the experience can be harrowing and often fatal.
University Of Baltimore Symposium Report: Debut Of “The Matthew Fogg Symposia On The Vitality Of Stare Decisis In America”, Zena D. Crenshaw-Logal
University Of Baltimore Symposium Report: Debut Of “The Matthew Fogg Symposia On The Vitality Of Stare Decisis In America”, Zena D. Crenshaw-Logal
Zena Denise Crenshaw-Logal
On the first of each two day symposium of the Fogg symposia, lawyers representing NGOs in the civil rights, judicial reform, and whistleblower advocacy fields are to share relevant work of featured legal scholars in lay terms; relate the underlying principles to real life cases; and propose appropriate reform efforts. Four (4) of the scholars spend the next day relating their featured articles to views on the vitality of stare decisis. Specifically, the combined panels of public interest attorneys and law professors consider whether compliance with the doctrine is reasonably assured in America given the: 1. considerable discretion vested in …
Back To The Future: Introducing Constructive Feminism For The Twenty-First Century: A New Paradigm For The Family And Medical Leave Act, Arianne Renan Barzilay Dr.
Back To The Future: Introducing Constructive Feminism For The Twenty-First Century: A New Paradigm For The Family And Medical Leave Act, Arianne Renan Barzilay Dr.
Arianne Renan Barzilay Dr. (J.S.D., New York University School of Law)
Abstract: At least ninety percent (90%) of American parents, mothers and fathers, say they are experiencing an acute shortage of time spent with family and an intense work-family conflict. This article provides a history and a theory that should inform our conceptualization of work-family regulation. It points to the neglected history of working-class social feminism. It shows how working-class social feminists at the beginning of the twentieth century advocated for “constructive feminism”—government support, by way of labor regulation, of what this article terms “multidimensionalism”—a life enriched by meaningful dimensions of work, family, civic participation, and culture. The Article extends this …
Washington Was Right: The Supreme Court Could Have Intervened To Interpret French Treaties, Kevin P. Chapman
Washington Was Right: The Supreme Court Could Have Intervened To Interpret French Treaties, Kevin P. Chapman
Kevin P. Chapman
In the early days of his presidency, George Washington faced his first international crisis when French Ambassador Genet demanded that the United States honor its treaty obligations and provide support to the new French Republic in its ongoing war with Great Britain. Concerned about the legal effect that the French Revolution had on the viability of these obligations, Washington asked the Supreme Court to render an opinion. Chief Justice John Jay replied that the Constitution did not authorize the Supreme Court to render advisory opinions.
If Jay was correct, why did Washington, who presided over the very convention that produced …