Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 20th century (1)
- Administrative acts (1)
- American law (1)
- Appellate court performance (1)
- Best practices for courts (1)
-
- CLT (1)
- Certiorari (1)
- Circuit court (1)
- Circuit court precedent (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Courts (1)
- Crowell v. Benson (1)
- Deference (1)
- English law (1)
- Expertise (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- New Deal (1)
- Ninth Circuit (1)
- Non-precedential opinions (1)
- Norms (1)
- Oral argument (1)
- Promissory estoppel (1)
- Roosevelt (Franklin Delano) (1)
- Supreme Court agenda (1)
- Supreme Court bar (1)
- Tradition (1)
- US Court of Appeals (1)
- Willamette Court Study Committee (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
The Era Of Deference: Courts, Expertise, And The Emergence Of New Deal Administrative Law, Reuel E. Schiller
The Era Of Deference: Courts, Expertise, And The Emergence Of New Deal Administrative Law, Reuel E. Schiller
Michigan Law Review
The first two terms of Franklin Roosevelt's presidency (1933-1941) were periods of great administrative innovation. Responding to the Great Depression, Congress created scores of new administrative agencies charged with overseeing economic policy and implementing novel social welfare programs. The story of the constitutional difficulties that some of these policy innovations encountered is a staple of both New Deal historiography and the constitutional history of twentieth-century America. There has been very little writing, however, about how courts and the New Deal-era administrative state interacted after these constitutional battles ended. Having overcome constitutional hurdles, these administrative agencies still had to interact with …
A Modest Proposal For Regulating Unpublished, Non-Precedential Federal Appellate Opinions While Courts And Litigants Adapt To Federal Rule Of Appellate Procedure 32.1, Sarah E. Ricks
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Seeking Best Practices Among Intermediate Courts Of Appeal: A Nascent Journey, W. Warren H. Binford, Preston C. Greene, Maria C. Schmidlkofer
Seeking Best Practices Among Intermediate Courts Of Appeal: A Nascent Journey, W. Warren H. Binford, Preston C. Greene, Maria C. Schmidlkofer
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Experience Matters: The Rise Of A Supreme Court Bar And Its Effect On Certiorari, Joseph W. Swanson
Experience Matters: The Rise Of A Supreme Court Bar And Its Effect On Certiorari, Joseph W. Swanson
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Bureaucratization And Balkanization: The Origins And Effects Of Decision-Making Norms In The Federal Appellate Courts, Stefanie A. Lindquist
Bureaucratization And Balkanization: The Origins And Effects Of Decision-Making Norms In The Federal Appellate Courts, Stefanie A. Lindquist
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Promissory Estoppel: The Life History Of An Ideal Legal Transplant, Joel M. Ngugi
Promissory Estoppel: The Life History Of An Ideal Legal Transplant, Joel M. Ngugi
University of Richmond Law Review
This article hopes to accomplish three things. First, it will revisit the historical origins of the doctrine of promissory estoppel in the American law of contracts and the role that Samuel Williston, the Chief Reporter of the Restatement (First) of Contracts ("First Restatement") played in the evolution of the doctrine. The dominant theory is that Williston conceptualized the new promissory estoppel doctrine in a way that retarded and blunted the doctrine shortly after its birth. This theory is adhered to by both critics and proponents of the expansion of promissory estoppel as a ground of promissory obligation. According to both …