Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (3)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Aboriginal self-government (1)
- Bicamerial legislature (1)
-
- Bill of Rights (1)
- Canada (1)
- Charlottetown Accord (1)
- Checks and balances (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
- Comparative law (1)
- Constitutional Convention (1)
- Contract Clause (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Economic Rights (1)
- Environmental regulation (1)
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Federalist Papers (1)
- First Nations (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Framers (1)
- Hamilton (1)
- History (1)
- Hume (1)
- Indian tribes (1)
- Indigenous peoples (1)
- Individual Rights (1)
- Interest (1)
- Intergovernmental agreements (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
On Misreading John Bingham And The Fourteenth Amendment, Richard L. Aynes
On Misreading John Bingham And The Fourteenth Amendment, Richard L. Aynes
Akron Law Faculty Publications
Nearly fifty years ago, Professor Charles Fairman published his seminal article, Does the Fourteenth Amendment Incorporate the Bill of Rights? According to Fairman, it does not. Fairman's analysis of the congressional debates and other historical data on the Fourteenth Amendment led him to conclude that the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Amendment does not make the Bill of Rights applicable to the states. Instead, Fairman argued that the intent of the Amendment's framers is most nearly realized by the use of the Due Process Clause to enforce against the states only those rights “ ‘implicit in the concept of …
The Political Process As Final Solution, Charles M. Freeland
The Political Process As Final Solution, Charles M. Freeland
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Historical Framework For Reviving Constitutional Protection For Property And Contract Rights , James L. Kainen
Historical Framework For Reviving Constitutional Protection For Property And Contract Rights , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
Post-New Deal constitutionalism is in search of a theory that justifies judicial intervention on behalf of individual rights while simultaneously avoiding the charge of "Lochnerism."' The dominant historical view dismisses post-bellum substantive due process as an anomalous development in the American constitutional tradition. Under this approach, Lochner represents unbounded protection for economic rights that permitted the judiciary to read laissez faire, pro-business policy preferences into the constitutional text. Today's revisionists have mounted a substantial challenge to the dismissive views of traditionalists. Indeed, some claim Lochner reached the right result, but for the wrong reason. The revisionists characterize substantive due process …
Is There A Twenty-Seventh Amendment - The Unconstitutionality Of A New 203-Year-Old Amendment, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 977 (1993), Christopher M. Kennedy
Is There A Twenty-Seventh Amendment - The Unconstitutionality Of A New 203-Year-Old Amendment, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 977 (1993), Christopher M. Kennedy
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Confirming The Constitution: The Role Of The Senate Judiciary Committee, Stephen Wermiel
Confirming The Constitution: The Role Of The Senate Judiciary Committee, Stephen Wermiel
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
The Federalist Papers: The Framers Construct An Orrery, Harold H. Bruff
The Federalist Papers: The Framers Construct An Orrery, Harold H. Bruff
Publications
No abstract provided.
Negotiated Sovereignty: Intergovernmental Agreements With American Indian Tribes As Models For Expanding First Nations’ Self-Government, David H. Getches
Negotiated Sovereignty: Intergovernmental Agreements With American Indian Tribes As Models For Expanding First Nations’ Self-Government, David H. Getches
Publications
Constitutional issues related to First Nations sovereignty have dominated Aboriginal affairs in Canada for a considerable period. The constitutional entrenchment of Aboriginal self-government has, however, received a setback with the recent failure of the Charlottetown Accord in October of 1992. Nonetheless, day-to-day issues must be accommodated, even while this more fundamental constitutional question remains unresolved. This paper illustrates the American experience with negotiated intergovernmental agreements between tribes and individual states. These agreements have, for example, resolved jurisdictional disputes over taxation, solid waste disposal, and law enforcement between state governments and tribal authorities. The author suggests that these intergovernmental agreements in …
The Right To Privacy In The Pennsylvania Constitution, Seth F. Kreimer
The Right To Privacy In The Pennsylvania Constitution, Seth F. Kreimer
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Prospective Overruling And The Revival Of ‘Unconstitutional' Statutes, William Michael Treanor, Gene B. Sperling
Prospective Overruling And The Revival Of ‘Unconstitutional' Statutes, William Michael Treanor, Gene B. Sperling
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey reshaped the law of abortion in this country. The Court overturned two of its previous decisions invalidating state restrictions on abortions, Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, and it abandoned the trimester analytic framework established in Roe v. Wade. At the time Casey was handed down, twenty states had restrictive abortion statutes on the books that were in conflict with Akron or Thornburgh and which were unenforced. In six of these states, courts had held the statutes unconstitutional. Almost …
The Aspirational Constitution, Robin West
The Aspirational Constitution, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Firmly embedded in every theory of judicial decisionmaking lies an important set of assumptions about the way government is supposed to work. Sometimes these theories about government are made explicit. More often they are not. Moreover, deeply embedded in every theory of government is a theory of human nature. Although these assumptions about human nature generally remain latent within the larger theory, because they provide the underpinnings for our ideas about the way government is supposed to work, they drive our notions about judicial decisionmaking. For example, the theory of government reflected in the United States Constitution reveals what one …
Natural Law Ambiguities, Robin West
Natural Law Ambiguities, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
I share with Fred Schauer the relatively unpopular belief that the positivist insistence that we keep separate the legal "is" from the legal "ought" is a logical prerequisite to meaningful legal criticism, and therefore, in the constitutional context, is a logical prerequisite to meaningful criticism of the Constitution. As Schauer argues, despite the modern inclination to associate positivism with conservatism, the positivist "separation thesis," properly understood, facilitates legal criticism and legal reform, not reactionary acquiescence. If we want to improve law, we must resist the urge to see it through the proverbial rose-colored glasses; we must be clear that a …
Original Penumbras: Constitutional Interpretation In The First Year Of Congress, Kent Greenfield
Original Penumbras: Constitutional Interpretation In The First Year Of Congress, Kent Greenfield
Kent Greenfield
No abstract provided.