Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bar Exam (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Racial Equity (2)
- Assisted Reproductive Technology (1)
- Bar Passage (1)
-
- Black Law Students Association (1)
- Black Lawyers (1)
- Common Law Tort Principles (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Grading (1)
- Hernández v. Mesa (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (1)
- January 6th (1)
- LGBTQ Rights (1)
- Law School Grades (1)
- National Security (1)
- People's Republic of China (1)
- Privacy Rights (1)
- Race & Ethnicity (1)
- Race Disproportionality (1)
- Racial Disparate Impacts (1)
- Racial Reckoning (1)
- Surrogacy Laws (1)
- Symposium (1)
- U.S. Privacy Law (1)
- Washington Supreme Court (1)
- Washington’s Criminal Justice System (1)
- Washington’s Juvenile Legal System (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Tech And Authoritarianism: How The People’S Republic Of China Is Using Data To Control Hong Kong And Why The U.S. Is Vulnerable, Bryce Neary
Seattle Journal of Technology, Environmental & Innovation Law
The aim of this article is to analyze and compare current events in the People's Republic of China and the United States to discuss the moral dilemmas that arise when establishing the boundary between national security interests and individual privacy rights. As we continue to intertwine our lives with technology, it has become increasingly important to establish clear privacy rights. The question then becomes: at what point should individuals sacrifice their rights for what the government considers the "greater good" of the country?
Further, this article analyzes the development of U.S. privacy law and its relationship to national security, technology, …
Putting The Bar Exam On Constitutional Notice: Cut Scores, Race & Ethnicity, And The Public Good, Scott Johns
Putting The Bar Exam On Constitutional Notice: Cut Scores, Race & Ethnicity, And The Public Good, Scott Johns
Seattle University Law Review
Nothing to see here. Season in and season out, bar examiners, experts, supreme courts, and bar associations seem nonplussed, trapped by what they see as the facts, namely, that the bar exam has no possible weaknesses, at least when it comes to alternative licensure mechanisms, that the bar exam is not to blame for disparate racial impacts that spring from administration of this ritualistic process, and that there are no viable alternatives in the harsh cold world of determining minimal competency for the noble purpose of protecting the public from legal harms. All a lie, of course.
But rather than …
Foreword, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents