Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility

Lawyering And Client Decisionmaking: Informed Consent And The Legal Profession, Mark Spiegel Oct 1979

Lawyering And Client Decisionmaking: Informed Consent And The Legal Profession, Mark Spiegel

Mark Spiegel

In this Article, Professor Spiegel examines the doctrine of informed consent as it relates to the legal profession. The Article first traces the development of the informed-consent doctrine and then considers the extent to which current legal doctrines and professional norms incorporate informed consent between lawyers and their clients. Professor Spiegel suggests that the predominant focus of informed consent is on a lawyer’s power to bind his client vis-à-vis third parties and advocates for the development of an informed-consent doctrine that accounts for the interests of all parties involved. Professor Spiegel concludes with a discussion of the application of his …


Mosses From An Old Manse: Another Look At Some Historic Property Cases About The Environment, Daniel R. Coquillette May 1979

Mosses From An Old Manse: Another Look At Some Historic Property Cases About The Environment, Daniel R. Coquillette

Daniel R. Coquillette

Also appears in Land Use and Environment Law Review 12 (1981): 67-127, and in International Library of Essays in Law and Legal Theory: Environmental Law, edited by Michael C. Blum, 107-67. New York: New York University Press, 1992.


La Corte Suprema Y El Futuro Del País, Horacio M. Lynch Apr 1979

La Corte Suprema Y El Futuro Del País, Horacio M. Lynch

Horacio M. LYNCH

"...La influencia de la CSN en la estabilidad política y en la afirmación de las virtudes republicanas de gobierno...".


Medical Paternalism And The Rule Of Law: A Reply To Dr. Relman, Charles Baron Dec 1978

Medical Paternalism And The Rule Of Law: A Reply To Dr. Relman, Charles Baron

Charles H. Baron

In this Article, Professor Baron challenges the position taken recently by Dr. Arnold Relman in this journal that the 1977 Saikewicz decision of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts was incorrect in calling for routine judicial resolution of decisions whether to provide life-prolonging treatment to terminally ill incompetent patients. First, Professor Baron argues that Dr. Relman's position that doctors should make such decisions is based upon an outmoded, paternalistic view of the doctor-patient relationship. Second, he points out the importance of guaranteeing to such decisions the special qualities of process which characterize decision making by courts and which are not …