Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Anthropology (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Business (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Communication (1)
-
- Computer Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Education (1)
- Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research (1)
- Educational Technology (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Other Anthropology (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Speech and Rhetorical Studies (1)
- Technical and Professional Writing (1)
- Keyword
-
- AI software (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Automation (1)
- Breyer Committee Report (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
-
- Federal Judges (1)
- Federal Judicial Misconduct Statutes (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- Judicial Conduct (1)
- Judicial Discipline (1)
- Judicial Ethics (1)
- Judicial Misconduct (1)
- Judicial System (1)
- Legal technology (1)
- Legal text analytics (1)
- Machine learning (1)
- National Commission on Judicial Discipline and Removal (1)
- Patent claim indefiniteness (1)
- Patent text analysis (1)
- Reform (1)
- Rulemaking (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Using Ai To Analyze Patent Claim Indefiniteness, Dean Alderucci, Kevin D. Ashley
Using Ai To Analyze Patent Claim Indefiniteness, Dean Alderucci, Kevin D. Ashley
Articles
In this Article, we describe how to use artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to partially automate a type of legal analysis, determining whether a patent claim satisfies the definiteness requirement. Although fully automating such a high-level cognitive task is well beyond state-of-the-art AI, we show that AI can nevertheless assist the decision maker in making this determination. Specifically, the use of custom AI technology can aid the decision maker by (1) mining patent text to rapidly bring relevant information to the decision maker attention, and (2) suggesting simple inferences that can be drawn from that information.
We begin by summarizing the …
An Unfinished Dialogue: Congress, The Judiciary, And The Rules For Federal Judicial Misconduct Proceedings, Arthur D. Hellman
An Unfinished Dialogue: Congress, The Judiciary, And The Rules For Federal Judicial Misconduct Proceedings, Arthur D. Hellman
Articles
Federal judges can be impeached and removed from office for “high crimes and misdemeanors,” but what can be done to investigate and remedy less serious misconduct? Congress gave its answer 40 years ago when it passed the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980. The Act emerged from a series of complex interactions between Congress and the judiciary that could hardly be replicated today. Initially there was strong support, particularly in the Senate, for a centralized, “strictly adjudicatory” system, including a provision for removal of judges without impeachment. Over the course of several years, however, the judiciary persuaded Congress to …