Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 1998 RCRA Decree (1)
- 2009 CERCLA Decree (1)
- 866 F.3d 1108 (1)
- 9th Circuit (1)
- American Smelting and Refining Company (1)
-
- Anaconda (1)
- Anaconda Copper Mining Company (1)
- Anaconda Mining Company (1)
- Appeal (1)
- Arco (1)
- Asarco (1)
- Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (1)
- Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Company (1)
- Atlantic Richfield (1)
- Atlantic Richfield Co. (1)
- Atlantic Richfield Company (1)
- CERCLA (1)
- Carbon Dioxide (1)
- Circuit Split (1)
- Cleanup Costs (1)
- Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (1)
- Contamination (1)
- Contribution Action (1)
- Corrective Action (1)
- Dana L. Christensen (1)
- District of Montana (1)
- EPA (1)
- East Helena (1)
- East Helena Superfund Site (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Asarco Llc V. Atlantic Richfield Company, Ryan L. Hickey
Asarco Llc V. Atlantic Richfield Company, Ryan L. Hickey
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liabiltiy Act, commonly known as CERCLA, facilitates cleanup of hazardous waste sites and those contaminated by other harmful substances by empowering the Environmental Protection Agency to identify responsible parties and require them to undertake or fund remediation. Because pollution sometimes occurrs over long periods of time by multiple parties, CERCLA also enables polluters to seek financial contribution from other contaminators of a particular site. The Ninth Circuit clarified the particuar circumstances under which contribution actions may arise in Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co., holding non-CERCLA settlements may give rise to CERCLA contribution …
Kain V. Department Of Environmental Protection, Sarah M. Danno
Kain V. Department Of Environmental Protection, Sarah M. Danno
Public Land & Resources Law Review
Global climate change and its chronic frustrations generated passage of the Massachusetts Global Warming Solutions Act. The Massachusetts Legislature imposed time-bound implementation mandates on the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection with Massachusetts residents acting as compliance watchdogs. In Kain, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts interpreted the Act in favor of environmental integrity and strict agency compliance standards.