Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Access to lawyers (1)
- Access to legal advice (1)
- Access to legal representation (1)
- Astrue v. Ratliff (1)
- Attorney-Client Privilege (1)
-
- Belmontes (1)
- Bobby v. Van Hook (1)
- Fee-shifting statutes (1)
- Gallop & Milavetz (1)
- Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co. (1)
- Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (1)
- Jefferson v. Upton (1)
- Milavetz (1)
- P.A. v. United States (1)
- Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. Winn (1)
- Porter v. McCollum (1)
- Pre-Existing Documents (1)
- Privilege Waiver (1)
- Sears v. Upton (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
The Supreme Court's Increased Attention To The Law Of Lawyering: Mere Coincidence Or Something More? , Renee Newman Knake
The Supreme Court's Increased Attention To The Law Of Lawyering: Mere Coincidence Or Something More? , Renee Newman Knake
American University Law Review
The United States Supreme Court considered seventeen cases raising issues related to the role of attorneys and the practice of law during the 2009 Term. This body of cases represents a substantial departure from dockets in recent history, where typically the Court took up less than a handful of cases involving regulation of the legal profession. While some might consider the increased number of cases addressing the law of lawyering a mere coincidence, this article contends that something more is occurring. The Court’s decision to devote so much of its limited time to these matters is noteworthy not only for …
Attorney-Client Privilege: Continuing Confusion About Attorney Communications, Drafts, Pre-Existing Documents, And The Source Of The Facts Communicated , Paul R. Rice
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.