Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
![Digital Commons Network](http://assets.bepress.com/20200205/img/dcn/DCsunburst.png)
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Ethics: Informal Opinion 1151 - Lawyers And The Title "Doctor", Milard King Roper Jr.
Ethics: Informal Opinion 1151 - Lawyers And The Title "Doctor", Milard King Roper Jr.
Akron Law Review
The legal profession is the only professional group in the United States that has ever prohibited its practicing members with doctorates from using the title "Doctor." Now, with D.R. 2-102(F) of the Code and its interpretation in Informal Opinion 1151, lawyers have been given the opportunity to take advantage of the recognition of their education as being on a par with other doctoral training.
Lawyer Liability In Third Party Situations: The Meaning Of The Kaye Scholer Case, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
Lawyer Liability In Third Party Situations: The Meaning Of The Kaye Scholer Case, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
Akron Law Review
The purpose of this analysis is to explain what Kaye Scholer was about, what are the basic concepts of lawyer liability to third parties, and why the practicing bar should heed a "wake up call."
Cracks In The Profession's Monopoly Armor, John Sahl
Cracks In The Profession's Monopoly Armor, John Sahl
Akron Law Faculty Publications
This article examines the legal profession’s long-held monopoly in the nation’s legal services market in the context of two recent developments. The first development concerns the Conference of Chief Justices’ (CCJ) recent adoption of Resolution 15, “Encouraging Adoption of Rules Regarding Admission of Attorneys Who Are Dependents of Service Members.” Resolution 15 urges state bar authorities to develop and implement rules permitting admission without examination of lawyers who are military dependents. The CCJ’s rule promotes competition by facilitating the movement of lawyers from one geographic market to another.
The second development is Washington Supreme Court’s new Admission to Practice Rule …
Cracks In The Profession's Monopoly Armor, John Sahl
Cracks In The Profession's Monopoly Armor, John Sahl
John Sahl
This article examines the legal profession’s long-held monopoly in the nation’s legal services market in the context of two recent developments. The first development concerns the Conference of Chief Justices’ (CCJ) recent adoption of Resolution 15, “Encouraging Adoption of Rules Regarding Admission of Attorneys Who Are Dependents of Service Members.” Resolution 15 urges state bar authorities to develop and implement rules permitting admission without examination of lawyers who are military dependents. The CCJ’s rule promotes competition by facilitating the movement of lawyers from one geographic market to another.
The second development is Washington Supreme Court’s new Admission to Practice Rule …