Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Authority (1)
- Choice of Law (1)
- Consent (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Federal Conflicts (1)
-
- Federal Practice (1)
- Hart Lecture (1)
- Informed Consent (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Model Code of Professional Responsibilit (1)
- Moral obligation (1)
- Morality (1)
- Obeying authority (1)
- Poverty Law (1)
- Professional Conduct (1)
- Professional Ethics (1)
- Professional Standards and Responsibility (1)
- Social Welfare Law (1)
- State practice (1)
- Women (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
The Questions Of Authority, Frederick Schauer
The Questions Of Authority, Frederick Schauer
Philip A. Hart Memorial Lecture
In 1992, Professor, Frederick Schauer of Harvard University, delivered the Georgetown Law Center’s twelfth Annual Philip A. Hart Memorial Lecture: "Two Cheers for Authority: Should Officials Obey the Law?."
Frederick Schauer is a David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia. Previously he served for 18 years as Frank Stanton Professor of the First Amendment at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, where he has served as academic dean and acting dean, and before that was a Professor of Law at the University of Michigan. He is the author of The Law …
A Meditation On The Theoretics Of Practice, Robert Dinerstein
A Meditation On The Theoretics Of Practice, Robert Dinerstein
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
State Ethical Codes And Federal Practice: Emerging Conflicts And Suggestions For Reform, Stephen B. Burbank
State Ethical Codes And Federal Practice: Emerging Conflicts And Suggestions For Reform, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
The standards for resolving putative conflicts between federal laws are not always clear, and neither for that matter is the standard for determining what constitutes a federal law capable of superseding effect. The technique of setting federal norms of professional conduct on a decentralized basis by borrowing or incorporating state norms is increasingly troublesome to the extent that the borrowed state norms are disuniform and that they are being put to multiple remedial purposes. Federal legislation preempting state law of professional conduct is conceivable but hardly likely, particularly as the norms are pressed into duty for purposes other than professional …