Legal Education Commons^™

Ethically Ambiguous Negotiation Tactics (Eants): What Are The Rules Behind The Rules?, John Wade

John Wade

This paper will briefly discuss the following: • A catalogue of the EANTs in use in negotiation and litigation. • How common are these behaviours amongst lawyers? • What are the attempted controls (or not) of these EANTs in different cultures?---market isolation, law, and “ethics”? • Focussing on attempted ethical controls, what are the five (often overlapping) historic schools of “ethics”? • Which school of “ethics” do various written codes of law societies predominantly reflect? –answer: pragmatism and self interest. • If the epidemic of EANTs needs to be reduced, should pragmatism and self interest be taught and modelled more …

Reasons For The Tensions Between The Cultures Of Law School And Law Office, John Wade

John Wade

This paper identifies a catalogue of reasons for tensions between two cultures, bracketed broadly under the heading of “formal university law school” and “professional legal practice”.1The paper suggests that some of these conflicts are remediable, some are inevitable and some are beneficial.

'Judicial' Decision-Making In Australia: Critique And Redemption, John Wade

John Wade

Extract: In Australia, as in most countries, the landscape of judges is vast. Judicial activity can be categorised in many ways. For example, first there is a tiny minority of judges with ’lifelong’ appointments (ie, to the age of 70 or 72 years); who are appointed by the government in power; who work in offices which look like traditional ’courtrooms’; and whose decision-making processes are usually publicised by observers and the publication of decisions and reasoning; and who, importantly, are constitutionally protected from political interference.

Meet Mirat Legal Reasoning Fragmented Into Learnable Chunks, John H. Wade

John Wade

Extract: Here is one method of describing the analytical aspect of "thinking like a lawyer" which has proved to many law students to be: * easy to remember * able to be used at different levels of sophistication * capable of use in every area of law * useful to define a personal or group educational goal * a reasonably precise method for a student to measure his/her performance in any written/spoken exercise * a helpful method for teachers to model in chunks * a satisfying method for marking written or spoken analytical exercises as strengths and weaknesses of each …

"Judicial" Decision-Making In Australia – Critique And Redemption, John Wade

John Wade

Extract:

This paper has four parts, namely a description of:

A. The Context ▪ Australia (the place) ▪ The vast landscape of “judicial” or quasi-judicial decision makers

B. The Commentary ▪ Repetitive critiques of judicial decision-making ▪ Redemption of judicial decision making

Plus an Appendix on Court Structures with details and diagrams.

Duelling Experts In Mediation And Negotiation: How To Respond When Eager Expensive Entrenched Expert Egos Escalate Enmity, John Wade

John Wade

Having dueling experts is a predictable problem for negotiators and mediators. A routine process in response is set out: normalizing, reframing, and turning the barrier into a standard problem-solving question. Twelve standard responses (each with inevitable advantages and disadvantages) are systematized for mediators and negotiators to learn and possibly add value to any negotiation.

Lawyers And Mediators: What Each Needs To Learn From And About The Other, John Wade

John Wade

The mediation movement has been given publicity, funds of taxpayers, and support by propagating simplistic notions of the “adversary” system and of what lawyers do on a daily basis. Conversely, lawyers have often attempted to neutralise this rival profession by (as major doorkeepers to serious family disputes) wilful ignorance of their own behaviour, ignorant criticism of mediator behaviour, anecdotal warfare and attempts to co-opt mediation under their own monopolistic umbrella.

This paper reflects upon the behaviour of both family lawyers and family mediators with the aim of assisting each group understand the other. Both groups have much to learn from …