Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Australia (1)
- Bedford Hills Correctional Facilty for Women (1)
- Bennett (1)
- Coercion (1)
-
- Confessions (1)
- Court jurisdiction (1)
- Court supervisory power (1)
- Criminal cases (1)
- Crooks v. Warne (1)
- Custody (1)
- Due process principles (1)
- Exclusionary remedy (1)
- Extradition Treaty (1)
- Federal criminal justice system (1)
- Fourth Amendenment exclusionary rule (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Gender and law (1)
- Governmental conduct (1)
- Interrogation (1)
- Judicial integrity (1)
- Jurisprudence, Government, Courts, and Constitutional Law (1)
- Miranda (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- Prison conditions (1)
- Prisoners (1)
- Prisons (1)
- Solitary confinement (1)
- U.S. v. Alvarez-Machain (1)
- Women (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law Enforcement and Corrections
Centering Women In Prisoners' Rights Litigation, Amber Baylor
Centering Women In Prisoners' Rights Litigation, Amber Baylor
Amber Baylor
This Article consciously employs both a dignity rights-based framing and methodology. Dignity rights are those rights that are based on the Kantian assertion of “inalienable human worth.”29 This framework for defining rights spans across a number of disciplines, including medicine and human rights law.30 Disciplinary sanctions like solitary confinement or forced medication might be described as anathema to human dignity because of their degrading effect on an individual’s emotional and social well-being.
This Article relies on first-person oral histories where possible. Bioethics scholar Claire Hooker argues that including narratives in work on dignity rights “is both a moral and an …
Punitive Injunctions, Nirej S. Sekhon
Judicial Integrity: A Call For Its Re-Emergence In The Adjudication Of Criminal Cases, Robert M. Bloom
Judicial Integrity: A Call For Its Re-Emergence In The Adjudication Of Criminal Cases, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
A court can invalidate or rectify certain kinds of offensive official action on the grounds of judicial integrity. In the past, it has served as a check on overzealous law enforcement agents whose actions so seriously impaired due process principles that they shocked the bench’s conscience. The principle not only preserves the judiciary as a symbol of lawfulness and justice, but it also insulates the courts from becoming aligned with illegal actors and their bad acts. The 1992 case of U.S. v. Alvarez-Machain, however, may have signaled a departure from past practices. This article reviews current Supreme Court cases and …
Symposium Introduction -- Miranda At 40: Applications In A Post-Enron, Post-9/11 World, Donald J. Kochan
Symposium Introduction -- Miranda At 40: Applications In A Post-Enron, Post-9/11 World, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
The groundbreaking case of Miranda v. Arizona raise[d] questions which go to the roots of our concepts of American criminal jurisprudence: the restraints society must observe consistent with the Federal Constitution in prosecuting individuals for crime. This Introduction to the 2007 Chapman Law Review Symposium summarizes the contemporary examination of Miranda's influence, past and present, along with the continuing debate today. The experiences and precedents that have evolved in the past 40 years helps to explore the evolution of the criminal law and procedural dictates set forth in Miranda. Complications with custodial interrogation - and the impulses and incentives involved …