Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Adult and Continuing Education Administration (1)
- American Politics (1)
- Behavioral Economics (1)
-
- Business (1)
- Business Administration, Management, and Operations (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Business and Corporate Communications (1)
- Communication (1)
- Community College Education Administration (1)
- Comparative Politics (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Curriculum and Social Inquiry (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Economic History (1)
- Economic Theory (1)
- Economics (1)
- Education (1)
- Educational Administration and Supervision (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Elementary and Middle and Secondary Education Administration (1)
- Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations (1)
- Higher Education Administration (1)
- Industrial Organization (1)
- International Relations (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law and Society
The Tenuous Case For Conscience, Steven D. Smith
The Tenuous Case For Conscience, Steven D. Smith
Steven D. Smith
If there is any single theme that has provided the foundation of modern liberalism and has infused our more specific constitutional commitments to freedom of religion and freedom of speech, that theme is probably “freedom of conscience.” But some observers also perceive a progressive cheapening of conscience– even a sort of degradation. Such criticisms suggest the need for a contemporary rethinking of conscience. When we reverently invoke “conscience,” do we have any idea what we are talking about? Or are we just exploiting a venerable theme for rhetorical purposes without any clear sense of what “conscience” is or why it …
Collective Choice, Justin Schwartz
Collective Choice, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
This short nontechnical article reviews the Arrow Impossibility Theorem and its implications for rational democratic decisionmaking. In the 1950s, economist Kenneth J. Arrow proved that no method for producing a unique social choice involving at least three choices and three actors could satisfy four seemingly obvious constraints that are practically constitutive of democratic decisionmaking. Any such method must violate such a constraint and risks leading to disturbingly irrational results such and Condorcet cycling. I explain the theorem in plain, nonmathematical language, and discuss the history, range, and prospects of avoiding what seems like a fundamental theoretical challenge to the possibility …
Why Law?, James M. Donovan
Why Law?, James M. Donovan
James M. Donovan
Fairness, then, not order, is the special domain of law. The accompaniments of law we expect in our society flow less from law itself, and more from our changing understanding of what is fair. As our understanding of fairness changes, we expect the law to change as well. Because fairness criteria have been shown empirically to vary from society to society, we can expect legal diversity to remain an enduring feature of the jurisprudential landscape. But now we know why.