Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Legal Positivists (1)
- Legal agreement (1)
- Legal positivism (1)
- Natural law (1)
- Note; urbanization; city growth; urban development; urban problems; legal issues; developing countries; housing; public services; population growth (1)
-
- Theories of law (1)
- United States; Mexican; Mexico; border; borders; city growth; industry; industries; cooperation; population; urban; urbanization; transfrontier; nationalistic; symbiotic; dependent; interdependent; zona fronteriza (1)
- Urbanization; urban; population growth; public services; developing world; developing country; DC's; migration; industrialization; redistribution; immigrants; poverty; employment; economic growth; government inaction; infrustructure (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law and Society
City Growth And Cooperation Along The United States/Mexican Border, Nora M. Tocups
City Growth And Cooperation Along The United States/Mexican Border, Nora M. Tocups
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Urbanization And Public Services, Fredric Stearns
Urbanization And Public Services, Fredric Stearns
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Symposium: Legal Issues And Urbanization In Developing Countries-Foreward, Georgia Journal Of International And Comparative Law
Symposium: Legal Issues And Urbanization In Developing Countries-Foreward, Georgia Journal Of International And Comparative Law
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Legal Agreement, Andrew Tutt
Legal Agreement, Andrew Tutt
Akron Law Review
This Article grapples with the question of what it means to agree about what the law is. First, it shows that the question of what it means to “agree about the law” invites us to consider many different kinds of agreement and disagreement we might have about what the law is. Second, it shows that without selecting one of these kinds of agreement, we cannot speak intelligibly about whether we agree or disagree. Third, it explains that this failure to choose is a source of much confusion and apparent disagreement between competing philosophers and philosophies of law. Fourth, it argues …