Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Law and Society (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Bioethics and the Law (1)
- Chevron Deference (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
-
- Commerce Clause (1)
- Complicity (1)
- Conscientious objection (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional Law, First Amendment, Election Law (1)
- General Law (1)
- Health (1)
- Health Benefit Exchange (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Hobby Lobby (1)
- Industrial hygiene--Law and legislation (1)
- Industrial safety--Law and legislation (1)
- Internal Revenue Service (1)
- King v. Burwell (1)
- Labor laws and legislation (1)
- Massachusetts v. EPA (1)
- ObamaCare (1)
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (1)
- Psychology and Psychiatry (1)
- Religious freedom (1)
- Reproductive rights (1)
- Safety (1)
- Standards (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Tax Law (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law and Society
Bridging The Quality Gap With Medical-Legal Partnerships, Lisa Bliss, Sylvia Caley, Robert Pettignano
Bridging The Quality Gap With Medical-Legal Partnerships, Lisa Bliss, Sylvia Caley, Robert Pettignano
Sylvia B. Caley
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Courts In The Debate On Assisted Suicide: A Communitarian Approach, 9 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 367 (1995), Donald L. Beschle
The Role Of Courts In The Debate On Assisted Suicide: A Communitarian Approach, 9 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 367 (1995), Donald L. Beschle
Donald L. Beschle
No abstract provided.
California’S Good Samaritan Law: Correcting Ambiguities To Induce Action, Sara Popovich
California’S Good Samaritan Law: Correcting Ambiguities To Induce Action, Sara Popovich
Sara Popovich
This Note argues that California should amend its Good Samaritan law by either creating a duty to assist or clarifying the statute. It first outlines the history of Good Samaritan law in California and describe developments in the law through today. It then argues that Good Samaritan law in California is ineffective because citizens still fear legal liability and thus refuse to assist during emergencies. Finally, it proposes specific changes to the California Good Samaritan law.
The Determination Of Occupational Health And Safety Standards In Ontario 1860-1982: From Markets To Politics To...?, Eric Tucker
The Determination Of Occupational Health And Safety Standards In Ontario 1860-1982: From Markets To Politics To...?, Eric Tucker
Eric M. Tucker
The author reviews the historical development of the decision-making frameworks within which courts and the Legislature have made choices regarding the allocation of risks to health and safety in the workplace. Arguing that this development has been conditioned by the necessity of satisfying in a capitalist democracy conflicting demands to facilitate capital accumulation and to justify to the electorate the manner in which choices regarding the structure of the processes of production have been made, the author contends that recent pressure to adopt cost-benefit analysis to satisfy the demands of legitimation and accumulation, and challenges its adequacy as a normative …
Conscience And Complicity: Assessing Pleas For Religious Exemptions After Hobby Lobby, Amy Sepinwall
Conscience And Complicity: Assessing Pleas For Religious Exemptions After Hobby Lobby, Amy Sepinwall
Amy J. Sepinwall
In the paradigmatic case of conscientious objection, the objector claims that his religion forbids him from actively participating in a wrong (e.g., by fighting in a war). In the religious challenges to the Affordable Care Act’s employer mandate, on the other hand, employers claim that their religious convictions forbid them from merely subsidizing insurance through which their employees might commit a wrong (e.g., by using contraception). The understanding of complicity underpinning these challenges is vastly more expansive than what standard legal doctrine or moral theory contemplates. Courts routinely reject claims of conscientious objection to taxes that fund military initiatives, or …
King V. Burwell And The Rise Of The Administrative State, Ronald D. Rotunda
King V. Burwell And The Rise Of The Administrative State, Ronald D. Rotunda
Ronald D. Rotunda
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) is a complex law totaling nearly a thousand pages in length. The litigation now before the Supreme Court in King v. Burwell presents, on the surface, a simple issue of statutory interpretation. However, that surface has a very thin veneer. If the Court allows administrators carte blanche to change the very words of a statute, we will have come a long way towards governance by bureaucrats. Over the years, Congress has delegated many of its powers, but it has never delegated the power to raise taxes or spend tax subsidies in ways …