Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Admission of Battered Woman Syndrome evidence; admission of Rape Trauma Syndrome evidence; Daubert standard; inadequacy of Battered Woman Syndrome methodology; scientific reliability of Battered Woman Syndrome; courts as gatekeepers of reliable scientific evidence; four factors of Daubert; social sciences; State v. Saldana; State v. Black; scientific reliability of Rape Trauma Syndrome; defense-oriented social science evidence; Black Rage; Black Rage defenses; (1)
- CJP (1)
- Capital Jury Project (1)
- Capital defense (1)
- Capital jurors (1)
-
- Capital punishment (1)
- Convict leasing (1)
- Corrections (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Criminal Sentencing (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Future dangerousness (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Private prisons (1)
- Rule of law (1)
- Shafer v. South Carolina (1)
- Simmons v. South Carolina (1)
- Sovereignty (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law and Society
The Gender Gap: Revealing Inequities In Admission Of Social Science Evidence In Criminal Cases, Janet C. Hoeffel
The Gender Gap: Revealing Inequities In Admission Of Social Science Evidence In Criminal Cases, Janet C. Hoeffel
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Reforms In Capital Cases Applied To Perjury, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (2001), Steven Clark
Procedural Reforms In Capital Cases Applied To Perjury, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (2001), Steven Clark
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reflections On When "We, The People" Kill, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 713 (2001), Michael P. Seng
Reflections On When "We, The People" Kill, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 713 (2001), Michael P. Seng
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Future Dangerousness In Capital Cases: Always "At Issue", John H. Blume, Stephen P. Garvey, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Future Dangerousness In Capital Cases: Always "At Issue", John H. Blume, Stephen P. Garvey, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Under Simmons v. South Carolina, a capital defendant who, if not sentenced to death, will remain in prison with no chance of parole is constitutionally entitled to an instruction informing the jury of the fact, but only if the prosecution engages in conduct that places the defendant's future dangerousness "at issue." Based on data collected from interviews with South Carolina capital jurors, Professors Blume, Garvey and Johnson argue that future dangerousness is on the minds of most capital jurors, and is thus "at issue" in virtually all capital trials, regardless of the prosecution's conduct. Accordingly, the authors argue that …
Rule Of Law And The Limits Of Sovereignty: The Private Prison In Jurisprudential Perspective, Ahmed A. White
Rule Of Law And The Limits Of Sovereignty: The Private Prison In Jurisprudential Perspective, Ahmed A. White
Publications
No abstract provided.
Judicial Fact-Finding And Sentence Enhancements In A World Of Guilty Pleas, Stephanos Bibas
Judicial Fact-Finding And Sentence Enhancements In A World Of Guilty Pleas, Stephanos Bibas
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.