Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Board of Immigration Appeals (1)
- Census data (1)
- Crimes (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- Deportation (1)
-
- Drugs (1)
- Fletcher v. Lamone (1)
- Gerrymandering (1)
- Little v. LATFOR (1)
- Maryland (1)
- Moncrieffe v. Holder (1)
- Narcotics (1)
- New York (1)
- Permanent residents (1)
- Police (1)
- Prison-based gerrymandering (1)
- Prisoners (1)
- Prisons (1)
- Race and law (1)
- Racial profiling (1)
- Redistricting (1)
- Removal proceedings (1)
- United States Census Bureau (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Vote dilution (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law and Race
One Significant Step: How Reforms To Prison Districts Begin To Address Political Inequality, Erika L. Wood
One Significant Step: How Reforms To Prison Districts Begin To Address Political Inequality, Erika L. Wood
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Skyrocketing rates of incarceration over the last three decades have had profound and lasting effects on the political power and engagement of local communities throughout the United States. Aggressive enforcement practices and mandatory sentencing laws have an impact beyond the individuals who are arrested, convicted, and incarcerated. These policies have wide-ranging and enduring ripple effects throughout the communities that are most heavily impacted by criminal laws, predominantly urban and minority neighborhoods. Criminal justice policies broadly impact everything from voter turnout and engagement, to serving on juries, participating in popular protests, census data, and the way officials draw legislative districts. The …
Racial Profiling In The War On Drugs Meets The Immigration Removal Process: The Case Of Moncrieffe V. Holder, Kevin R. Johnson
Racial Profiling In The War On Drugs Meets The Immigration Removal Process: The Case Of Moncrieffe V. Holder, Kevin R. Johnson
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In Moncrieffe v. Holder, the Supreme Court held that the Board of Immigration Appeals could not remove a long-term lawful permanent resident from the United States based on a single misdemeanor conviction for possession of a small amount of marijuana. The decision clarified the meaning of an “aggravated felony” for purposes of removal, an important question under the U.S. immigration laws. In the removal proceedings, Adrian Moncrieffe, a black immigrant from Jamaica, did not challenge his arrest and drug conviction. Consequently, the Supreme Court did not review the facts surrounding, or the lawfulness of, the criminal prosecution. Nonetheless, the traffic …