Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bounty system (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Checks and balances (1)
- Civil asset forfeiture (1)
- Clemency criteria (1)
-
- Coercion (1)
- College admissions (1)
- Communities of color (1)
- Commutation (1)
- Commutations (1)
- Contingency (1)
- Contingent fees (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Default (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Education law (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Equality (1)
- Ethical prohibition (1)
- Executive clemency (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Innocent owners (1)
- Judicial politics and ideology (1)
- Law enforcement (1)
- Lengthy sentences (1)
- Localism (1)
- Low income families (1)
- Nonviolent offenses (1)
- Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (1)
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Law and Race
Prosecuting Civil Asset Forfeiture On Contingency Fees: Looking For Profit In All The Wrong Places, Louis S. Rulli
Prosecuting Civil Asset Forfeiture On Contingency Fees: Looking For Profit In All The Wrong Places, Louis S. Rulli
All Faculty Scholarship
Civil asset forfeiture has strayed far from its intended purpose. Designed to give law enforcement powerful tools to combat maritime offenses and criminal enterprises, forfeiture laws are now used to prey upon innocent motorists and lawful homeowners who are never charged with crimes. Their only sins are that they are carrying legal tender while driving on busy highways or providing shelter in their homes to adult children and grandchildren who allegedly sold small amounts of low-level drugs. Civil forfeiture abuses are commonplace throughout the country with some police even armed with legal waivers for property owners to sign on the …
What's Wrong With Sentencing Equality?, Richard A. Bierschbach, Stephanos Bibas
What's Wrong With Sentencing Equality?, Richard A. Bierschbach, Stephanos Bibas
All Faculty Scholarship
Equality in criminal sentencing often translates into equalizing outcomes and stamping out variations, whether race-based, geographic, or random. This approach conflates the concept of equality with one contestable conception focused on outputs and numbers, not inputs and processes. Racial equality is crucial, but a concern with eliminating racism has hypertrophied well beyond race. Equalizing outcomes seems appealing as a neutral way to dodge contentious substantive policy debates about the purposes of punishment. But it actually privileges deterrence and incapacitation over rehabilitation, subjective elements of retribution, and procedural justice, and it provides little normative guidance for punishment. It also has unintended …
Obama's Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free Decree, Paul H. Robinson
Obama's Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free Decree, Paul H. Robinson
All Faculty Scholarship
While agreeing that sentences for nonviolent drug offenses are too long, this Wall Street Journal op-ed piece argues that the large-scale clemency program planned by President Obama is misguided. It sets a dangerous precedent for using the clemency power beyond its traditional and intended purpose of providing a last-resort check on fairness and justice errors in individual cases, and instead uses the power to set sentencing policy. While many people will like the results of the current program, they will be less than happy when some future president uses it as precedent to promote a sentencing policy of which they …
The Ironies Of Affirmative Action, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
The Ironies Of Affirmative Action, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
All Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s most recent confrontation with race-based affirmative action, Fisher v. University of Texas, did not live up to people’s expectations—or their fears. The Court did not explicitly change the current approach in any substantial way. It did, however, signal that it wants race-based affirmative action to be subject to real strict scrutiny, not the watered-down version featured in Grutter v. Bollinger. That is a significant signal, because under real strict scrutiny, almost all race-based affirmative action programs are likely unconstitutional. This is especially true given the conceptual framework the Court has created for such programs—the way …
Who May Give Birth To Citizens? Reproduction, Eugenics, And Immigration, Dorothy E. Roberts
Who May Give Birth To Citizens? Reproduction, Eugenics, And Immigration, Dorothy E. Roberts
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Nature Of Blacks' Skepticism About Genetic Testing, Dorothy E. Roberts
The Nature Of Blacks' Skepticism About Genetic Testing, Dorothy E. Roberts
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Priority Paradigm: Private Choices And The Limits Of Equality, Dorothy E. Roberts
The Priority Paradigm: Private Choices And The Limits Of Equality, Dorothy E. Roberts
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Genetic Tie, Dorothy E. Roberts
Irrationality And Sacrifice In The Welfare Reform Consensus, Dorothy E. Roberts
Irrationality And Sacrifice In The Welfare Reform Consensus, Dorothy E. Roberts
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Is Equal Access The Prescription For Equity?, Victor Sidel, Dorothy E. Roberts, Jennifer Dohrn, Kathy Anastos, Nitza Milagros Escalera, Peter Holland, Sylvia Kleinman, Sylvia Law, Jack O'Sullivan, Robert Padgug, Dennis Rivera, Beth Weitzman
Is Equal Access The Prescription For Equity?, Victor Sidel, Dorothy E. Roberts, Jennifer Dohrn, Kathy Anastos, Nitza Milagros Escalera, Peter Holland, Sylvia Kleinman, Sylvia Law, Jack O'Sullivan, Robert Padgug, Dennis Rivera, Beth Weitzman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Deviance, Resistance, And Love, Dorothy E. Roberts
Deviance, Resistance, And Love, Dorothy E. Roberts
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Crime, Race And Reproduction, Dorothy E. Roberts
Crime, Race And Reproduction, Dorothy E. Roberts
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.