Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Equality (2)
- AHRC (1)
- ASIO (1)
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples (1)
- Abrams v. United States (1)
-
- Anti-Semitism (1)
- Antidiscrimination (1)
- Australia (1)
- Australian Human Rights Commission (1)
- Australian Law Reform Commission report on Multiculturalism and the Law (1)
- Australian Security Intelligence Organization (1)
- Australian criminal law (1)
- Barry O’Farrell (1)
- Bigoted (1)
- Bill of Rights (1)
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)
- Commonwealth racial vilification laws (1)
- Communities (1)
- Community Health Needs Assessment (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Cooperation (1)
- Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (1)
- Crimes Act 1900 (1)
- Cross burning (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Disparities (1)
- ECAJ (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Ethnicity (1)
- Executive Council of Australian Jewry (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law and Race
Normative History And Congress's Enforcement Power Under The Reconstruction Amendments, Edward Cantu
Normative History And Congress's Enforcement Power Under The Reconstruction Amendments, Edward Cantu
Faculty Works
As an originalist matter, what degree of logistical power did the Framers of the Reconstruction Amendments want Congress to have in actualizing the substantive guarantees of those amendments? In the 1990s the Court, seeking to revive its federalism vigilance, answered: "relatively limited power." Scholars pounced, and it quickly became "settled" in the scholarly literature that the Court had misread the historical record regarding the Framers' intent. Despite the scholarly reactions, the Roberts Court has carried the Rehnquist Court's torch on this interpretative matter. As such, strident accusations of conservative judicial activism toward the Roberts Court have paralleled the charges leveled …
Pushing An End To Sanctuary Cities: Will It Happen?, Raina Bhatt
Pushing An End To Sanctuary Cities: Will It Happen?, Raina Bhatt
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Sanctuary jurisdictions refer to city, town, and state governments (collectively, localities or local governments) that have passed provisions to limit their enforcement of federal immigration laws. Such local governments execute limiting provisions in order to bolster community cooperation, prevent racial discrimination, focus on local priorities for enforcement, or even to a show a local policy that differs from federal policy. The provisions are in the forms of executive orders, municipal ordinances, and state resolutions. Additionally, the scope of the provisions vary by locality: some prohibit law enforcement from asking about immigration status, while others prohibit the use of state resources …
Black Health Matters: Disparities, Community Health, And Interest Convergence, Mary Crossley
Black Health Matters: Disparities, Community Health, And Interest Convergence, Mary Crossley
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Health disparities represent a significant strand in the fabric of racial injustice in the United States, one that has proven exceptionally durable. Many millions of dollars have been invested in addressing racial disparities over the past three decades. Researchers have identified disparities, unpacked their causes, and tracked their trajectories, with only limited progress in narrowing the health gap between whites and racial and ethnic minorities. The implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the movement toward value-based payment methods for health care may supply a new avenue for addressing disparities. This Article argues that the ACA’s requirement that tax-exempt …
Human Rights Law And Racial Hate Speech Regulation In Australia: Reform And Replace?, Dr. Alan Berman
Human Rights Law And Racial Hate Speech Regulation In Australia: Reform And Replace?, Dr. Alan Berman
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Australians' "Right" To Be Bigoted: Protecting Minorities' Rights From The Tyranny Of The Majority, Jillian Rudge
Australians' "Right" To Be Bigoted: Protecting Minorities' Rights From The Tyranny Of The Majority, Jillian Rudge
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act (RDA) is a federal statute prohibiting behavior that offends, insults, humiliates, or intimidates people based on their race, nationality, ethnicity, or immigration status. It appropriately limits the right to freedom of expression where the exercise of that right encroaches on other, equally fundamental rights to equality and freedom from discrimination. The RDA is one of Australia’s few human rights laws focused on fighting racism. It is especially important for protecting the rights of minorities since Australia lacks a constitutional or federal bill of rights. Unfortunately, in 2014 and 2015, conservative politicians called for a repulsion of …