Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Sexism (2)
- Ableism (1)
- Academia (1)
- Academy (1)
- African American (1)
-
- African American women (1)
- Black women (1)
- Buck v. Bell (1)
- Classism (1)
- Dan Subotnik (1)
- Degeneracy theory (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Diversity candidate (1)
- Diversity hire (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Equality (1)
- Equity (1)
- Eugenics (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Gender bias (1)
- Hiring (1)
- Institutionalized racism (1)
- Intersectionality (1)
- Justice Holmes (1)
- LSAT (1)
- Law faculty (1)
- Law professor (1)
- Law schools (1)
- Lochner v. New York (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law and Race
Is Now A(Nother) Teachable Moment Honoring The Memory Of Dr. William S. Spriggs, Francine J. Lipman
Is Now A(Nother) Teachable Moment Honoring The Memory Of Dr. William S. Spriggs, Francine J. Lipman
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
“The Cruelty Is The Point”: Using Buck V. Bell As A Tool For Diversifying Instruction In The Law School Classroom, Tiffany C. Graham
“The Cruelty Is The Point”: Using Buck V. Bell As A Tool For Diversifying Instruction In The Law School Classroom, Tiffany C. Graham
Scholarly Works
Instructors who are looking for opportunities to expose their students to the ways in which intersectional forms of bias impact policy and legal rules can use Buck v. Bell to explore, for instance, the impact of disability and class on the formation of doctrine. A different intersectional approach might use the discussion of the case as a gateway to a broader conversation about the ways in which race and gender bias structured the implementation of sterilization policies around the nation. Finally, those who wish to examine the global impact of American forms of bias can use this case and the …
Maybe Law Schools Do Not Oppress Minority Faculty Women: A Critique Of Meera E. Deo’S “Unequal Profession: Race And Gender In Legal Academia” (Stanford University Press 2019), Dan Subotnik
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Testing, Discrimination, And Opportunity: A Reply To Professor Harvey Gilmore, Dan Subotnik
Testing, Discrimination, And Opportunity: A Reply To Professor Harvey Gilmore, Dan Subotnik
Scholarly Works
This article was written as part of an ongoing dialog about the author’s previous article, "Does Testing = Race Discrimination?: Ricci, The Bar Exam, the LSAT, and the Challenge to Learning," which defended the Supreme Court’s decision in Ricci v. DeStefano, as well as defending testing more generally against charges of irrelevance, racial obtuseness, and most seriously, race discrimination.
This article specifically responds to an article written by Professor Harvey Gilmore which focuses mostly on the SAT and the LSAT.