Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Admissions (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- African Americans (1)
- Bias (1)
- Burdens of proof (1)
-
- Civil Rights; Jurisprudence; Affirmative Action; Race Issues (1)
- Colleges and universities (1)
- Constitutional Law; Race Issues; Supreme Court of the United States; Affirmative Action; Education (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Disparate treatment (1)
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Fisher v. University of Texas (1)
- Grutter v. Bollinger (1)
- Innocence projects (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Minorities (1)
- Prosecutor's ethics (1)
- Race (1)
- Race and law (1)
- Racial discrimination (1)
- Segregation (1)
- Strict scrutiny (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law and Race
How Much Diversity Can The Us Constitution Stand?, Tanya Washington
How Much Diversity Can The Us Constitution Stand?, Tanya Washington
Tanya Monique Washington
No abstract provided.
From Slavery To Obama: The Affirmative Action Revolution, Tanya Washington
From Slavery To Obama: The Affirmative Action Revolution, Tanya Washington
Tanya Monique Washington
No abstract provided.
Jurisprudential Ties That Blind: The Means To Ending Affirmative Action, Tanya M. Washington
Jurisprudential Ties That Blind: The Means To Ending Affirmative Action, Tanya M. Washington
Tanya Monique Washington
No abstract provided.
The Limits Of Guilt And Shame And The Future Of Affirmative Action, 3 Ariz. St. L.J. Soc. Just. 211 (2013), Donald Beschle
The Limits Of Guilt And Shame And The Future Of Affirmative Action, 3 Ariz. St. L.J. Soc. Just. 211 (2013), Donald Beschle
Donald L. Beschle
No abstract provided.
How The Border Crossed Us: Filling The Gap Between Plume V. Seward And The Dispossession Of Mexican Landowners In California After 1848, 52 Clev. St. L. Rev. 297 (2005), Kim D. Chanbonpin
How The Border Crossed Us: Filling The Gap Between Plume V. Seward And The Dispossession Of Mexican Landowners In California After 1848, 52 Clev. St. L. Rev. 297 (2005), Kim D. Chanbonpin
Kim D. Chanbonpin
No abstract provided.
Truth Stories: Credibility Determinations At The Illinois Torture Inquiry And Relief Commission, 45 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 1085 (2014), Kim D. Chanbonpin
Truth Stories: Credibility Determinations At The Illinois Torture Inquiry And Relief Commission, 45 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 1085 (2014), Kim D. Chanbonpin
Kim D. Chanbonpin
This is the first scholarly Article to investigate the inner workings of the Illinois Torture Inquiry and Relief Commission (“TIRC”). The TIRC was established by statute in 2009 to provide legal redress for victims of police torture. Prisoners who claim that their convictions were based on confessions coerced by police torture can utilize the procedures available at the TIRC to obtain judicial review of their cases. For those who have exhausted all appeals and post-conviction remedies, the TIRC represents the tantalizing promise of justice long denied. To be eligible for relief, however, the claimant must first meet the TIRC’s strict …
Fisher V. Texas: The Limits Of Exhaustion And The Future Of Race-Conscious University Admissions, John Powell, Stephen Menendian
Fisher V. Texas: The Limits Of Exhaustion And The Future Of Race-Conscious University Admissions, John Powell, Stephen Menendian
john a. powell
This Article investigates the potential ramifications of Fisher v. Texas and the future of race-conscious university admissions. Although one cannot predict the ultimate significance of the Fisher decision, its brief and pregnant statements of law portends an increasingly perilous course for traditional affirmative action programs. Part I explores the opinions filed in Fisher, with a particular emphasis on Justice Kennedy’s opinion on behalf of the Court. We focus on the ways in which the Fisher decision departs from precedent, proscribes new limits on the use of race in university admissions, and tightens requirements for narrow tailoring. Part II investigates the …
Believe It Or Not: Mitigating The Negative Effects Personal Belief And Bias Have On The Criminal Justice System, Sarah Mourer
Believe It Or Not: Mitigating The Negative Effects Personal Belief And Bias Have On The Criminal Justice System, Sarah Mourer
Sarah Mourer
This article examines the prosecutor’s and defense attorney’s personal pre-trial beliefs regarding the accused’s guilt or innocence. This analysis suggests that when an attorney does hold pretrial beliefs, such beliefs lead to avoidable bias and errors. These biases may alter the findings throughout all stages of the case. The procedure asking that the prosecution seek justice while having nothing more than probable cause results in the prosecutor’s need to have a belief in guilt before proceeding to trial. While this belief is intended to foster integrity and fairness in the criminal justice system, to the contrary, it actually contributes to …