Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 1990) (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Confirming (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional Criminal Procedure (1)
-
- Constitutional defenses (1)
- Court of Appeals (1)
- Criminal prosecution (1)
- Defendants (1)
- Deliberation (1)
- Dismiss (1)
- Due process (1)
- Federal (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Indictment (1)
- Judge Simons (1)
- Justices (1)
- Larcenous acts (1)
- Larceny (1)
- Legislative assistants (1)
- Legislative immunity (1)
- Legislature (1)
- N.Y. Const. art. III (1)
- Naacp (1)
- Naacp legal defense and education fund (1)
- New York (1)
- No-show employees (1)
- Nomination (1)
- Payroll (1)
- Penal law (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law and Politics
Thurgood Marshall And The Administrative State, Jonathan Weinberg
Thurgood Marshall And The Administrative State, Jonathan Weinberg
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Judicial Ethics: Political Activity And Fund Raising, Marlene Arnold Nicholson
Judicial Ethics: Political Activity And Fund Raising, Marlene Arnold Nicholson
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Legal Scholars In The Confirmation Hearings For Supreme Court Nominees—Some Reflections, Thomas B. Mcaffee
The Role Of Legal Scholars In The Confirmation Hearings For Supreme Court Nominees—Some Reflections, Thomas B. Mcaffee
Scholarly Works
Until recently legal scholars have traditionally not been much involved in the process of confirming Justices. As the legal and political ideology of prospective Justices have come to play an important role in the process of nomination and confirmation, however, it is perhaps inevitable that legal scholars would also become more involved. At least since the nomination of Judge Bork, legal scholars have contributed in unprecedented numbers both to the Senate's deliberation process and to the public debate over the fitness of the nominees to the Court. The Bork hearings themselves were, of course, the watershed, and they remain, for …
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
The exclusionary evidence rules derived from the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments continue to play an important role in constitutional criminal procedure, despite the intense controversy that surrounds them. The primary justification for these rules has shifted from an "imperative of judicial integrity" to the "deterrence of police conduct that violates... [constitutional] rights." Regardless of the justification it uses for the rules' existence, the Supreme Court continues to limit their breadth "at the margin," when "the acknowledged costs to other values vital to a rational system of criminal justice" outweigh the deterrent effects of exclusion. The most notable limitation on …