Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- American Politics (4)
- Political Science (4)
- Sociology (4)
- Arts and Humanities (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
-
- Law and Society (3)
- Legal Studies (3)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (3)
- Business (2)
- Courts (2)
- Economics (2)
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Philosophy (2)
- Accounting Law (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Corporate Finance (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Criminology (1)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (1)
- Family, Life Course, and Society (1)
- History (1)
- Keyword
-
- Politics (3)
- Accounting (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Capital import neutrality (CIN) (1)
- Capital export neutrality (CEN) (1)
-
- Capital ownership neutrality (CON) (1)
- Citizen comment (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Criminal Sentencing (1)
- Direct investment (1)
- Equal Rights Amendment (1)
- Fairness (1)
- Federal regulation (1)
- Feminist constitutionalism (1)
- Foreign investment (1)
- Gender equality (1)
- International Law (1)
- International competitiveness (1)
- International taxation (1)
- Law and society (1)
- Legal and political history (1)
- Portfolio investment (1)
- Regulatory agencies (1)
- Section 892 (1)
- Securities Law (1)
- Sovereign wealth funds (1)
- Tax competition (1)
- Tax subsidy (1)
- Territorial taxation (1)
- U.S. Constitution (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law and Politics
Transparency And Public Participation In The Rulemaking Process: Recommendations For The New Administration, Cary Coglianese, Heather Kilmartin, Evan Mendelson
Transparency And Public Participation In The Rulemaking Process: Recommendations For The New Administration, Cary Coglianese, Heather Kilmartin, Evan Mendelson
All Faculty Scholarship
Each year, federal regulatory agencies create thousands of new rules that affect the economy. When these agencies insulate themselves too much from the public, they are more likely to make suboptimal decisions and decrease public acceptance of their resulting rules. A nonpartisan Task Force on Transparency and Public Participation met in 2008 to identify current deficiencies in agency rulemaking procedures and develop recommendations for the next presidential administration to improve the quality of regulations and the legitimacy of regulatory proceedings. This report summarizes the Task Force's deliberations, indicating ways that federal agencies could do a better job of seeking citizen …
Norm Change Or Judicial Decree? The Courts, The Public, And Welfare Reform, Amy L. Wax
Norm Change Or Judicial Decree? The Courts, The Public, And Welfare Reform, Amy L. Wax
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Policing Politics At Sentencing, Stephanos Bibas, Max M. Schanzenbach, Emerson H. Tiller
Policing Politics At Sentencing, Stephanos Bibas, Max M. Schanzenbach, Emerson H. Tiller
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A New E.R.A. Or A New Era? Amendment Advocacy And The Reconstitution Of Feminism, Serena Mayeri
A New E.R.A. Or A New Era? Amendment Advocacy And The Reconstitution Of Feminism, Serena Mayeri
All Faculty Scholarship
Scholars have largely treated the reintroduction of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) after its ratification failure in 1982 as a mere postscript to a long, hard-fought, and ultimately unsuccessful campaign to enshrine women’s legal equality in the federal constitution. This Article argues that “ERA II” was instead an important turning point in the history of legal feminism and of constitutional amendment advocacy. Whereas ERA I had once attracted broad bipartisan support, ERA II was a partisan political weapon exploited by advocates at both ends of the ideological spectrum. But ERA II also became a vehicle for feminist reinvention. Congressional consideration …
Symposium: Supreme Court Review, Symposium Foreword, Mitchell N. Berman
Symposium: Supreme Court Review, Symposium Foreword, Mitchell N. Berman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Treatment Differences And Political Realities In The Gaap-Ifrs Debate, William W. Bratton, Lawrence A. Cunningham
Treatment Differences And Political Realities In The Gaap-Ifrs Debate, William W. Bratton, Lawrence A. Cunningham
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Taxation And The Competitiveness Of Sovereign Wealth Funds: Do Taxes Encourage Sovereign Wealth Funds To Invest In The United States?, Michael S. Knoll
Taxation And The Competitiveness Of Sovereign Wealth Funds: Do Taxes Encourage Sovereign Wealth Funds To Invest In The United States?, Michael S. Knoll
All Faculty Scholarship
Sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) control vast amounts of capital and have made and are continuing to make numerous large, high-profile investments in the United States, especially in the financial services industry. Those investments in particular and SWFs in general are highly controversial. There is much discussion of the advantages and disadvantages to the United States of investments by SWFs and there is an intense and ongoing debate over what should be the United States’ policy towards investments by SWFs. In the course of that debate, some critics have called upon the US government to abandon its long-held public position of …