Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Election Law (17)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Legislation (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Courts (3)
-
- Law and Gender (3)
- Law and Race (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Legal History (3)
- President/Executive Department (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Criminal Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Judges (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- American Politics (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Construction Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- History (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Military, War, and Peace (1)
- Institution
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 25 of 25
Full-Text Articles in Law and Politics
Voting Rights In Corporate Governance: History And Political Economy, Sarah C. Haan
Voting Rights In Corporate Governance: History And Political Economy, Sarah C. Haan
Scholarly Articles
Political voting rights have become the subject of sharp legal wrangling in American political elections and the focus of headlines and popular debate. Less attention has focused on American corporate elections, where something similar has been happening: the last two decades have witnessed significant unsettling of basic shareholder voting rights, including laws and practices that were mostly stable throughout the twentieth century. Today, shareholder voting rights are in flux and, increasingly, in controversy. This Article connects the current moment of instability to the last significant era of change in shareholder voting rights—the nineteenth century—and brings historical context to a new …
States May Statutorily Bind Presidential Electors, The Myth Of National Popular Vote, The Reality Of Elector Unit Rule Voting And Old Light On Three-Fifths Of Other Persons, William Josephson
University of Miami Law Review
This Article discusses the United States Supreme Court’s July 6, 2020 decision in Chiafalo v. Washington State as it impacts the most in-depth analysis yet published of the proposed National Popular Vote (“NPV”) Interstate Compact. NPV purports to provide for popular vote election of a President of the United States even if the winner of the popular vote did not win the Electoral College. It concludes that NPV cannot accomplish its purported purpose. The article also criticizes a recent article proposing dividing each state’s electors vote in accordance with the popular vote proportions in each such state instead of, as …
Baby & Bathwater: Standing In Election Cases After 2020, Steven J. Mulroy
Baby & Bathwater: Standing In Election Cases After 2020, Steven J. Mulroy
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
The current consensus among commentators is that the flood of cases challenging the 2020 presidential election results was almost completely meritless. This consensus is correct as to the ultimate result, but not as to the courts’ treatment of standing. In their (understandable) zeal to reject sometimes frivolous attempts to overturn a legitimate election and undermine public confidence in our electoral system, many courts were too quick to rule that plaintiffs lacked standing. These rulings resulted in unjustified sweeping rulings that voters were not injured even if their legal votes were diluted by states accepting illegal votes; that campaigns did not …
Law School News: Whitehouse, Cicilline To Offer 'Inside View' Of 2nd Trump Impeachment Trial 02-17-2021, Michael M. Bowden
Law School News: Whitehouse, Cicilline To Offer 'Inside View' Of 2nd Trump Impeachment Trial 02-17-2021, Michael M. Bowden
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Rwu Law News: The Newsletter Of Roger Williams University School Of Law 12-2020, Barry Bridges, Michael M. Bowden, Nicole Dyszlewski, Louisa Fredey
Rwu Law News: The Newsletter Of Roger Williams University School Of Law 12-2020, Barry Bridges, Michael M. Bowden, Nicole Dyszlewski, Louisa Fredey
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Dollars And Sense: A "New Paradigm" For Campaign Finance Reform?, Daniel A. Farber
Dollars And Sense: A "New Paradigm" For Campaign Finance Reform?, Daniel A. Farber
Daniel A Farber
No abstract provided.
Howell V. Mcauliffe, L. Michael Berman
Howell V. Mcauliffe, L. Michael Berman
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
A New Proposal To Address Local Voting Discrimination, Cody Gray
A New Proposal To Address Local Voting Discrimination, Cody Gray
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Falcon Cannot Hear The Falconer: How California's Initiative Process Is Creating An Untenable Constitution, Rudy Klapper
The Falcon Cannot Hear The Falconer: How California's Initiative Process Is Creating An Untenable Constitution, Rudy Klapper
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
Californians have always cherished the idea that ultimate political power lies in the people, an idea best represented by the state’s hugely influential initiative process. Today, however, that initiative power threatens to spiral out of control, thanks in large part to the California Supreme Court’s inability to construe appropriate limits on it. This has created an unbalanced government where the rights of minorities are easily circumscribed and the financial and political infrastructure of the state is in danger of buckling under the combined weight of dozens of initiatives. This Article argues that the judiciary’s haphazard interpretation of various rules and …
"The Only Thing We Have To Fear Is Fear Itself": The Constitutional Infirmities With Felon Disenfranchisement And Citing Fear As The Rationale For Depriving Felons Of Their Right To Vote, Erika Stern
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
Felon disenfranchisement, a mechanism by which felons and former felons are deprived of their right to vote, is a widespread practice that has been challenged on many grounds. However, felon disenfranchisement has not yet been properly challenged under the First Amendment. This Article argues that states implicate felons’ First Amendment rights through felon disenfranchisement without citing adequate or compelling rationales to justify this severe intrusion. In fact, at least one rationale, a rationale based on the fear of the way felons might vote, is itself inconsistent with First Amendment principles. Disenfranchising felons based on a fear of the way that …
Lessons From Improvements In Military And Overseas Voting, Steven F. Huefner
Lessons From Improvements In Military And Overseas Voting, Steven F. Huefner
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Minority Vote Dilution In The Age Of Obama, Dale Ho
Minority Vote Dilution In The Age Of Obama, Dale Ho
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Line-Item Veto: The Best Response When Congress Passes One Spending “Bill” A Year, L. Gordon Crovitz
The Line-Item Veto: The Best Response When Congress Passes One Spending “Bill” A Year, L. Gordon Crovitz
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Election Law, Christopher R. Nolen
Election Law, Christopher R. Nolen
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Trial Of Susan B. Anthony For Illegal Voting, Douglas O. Linder
The Trial Of Susan B. Anthony For Illegal Voting, Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
More than any other woman of her generation, Susan B. Anthony saw that all of the legal disabilities faced by American women owed their existence to the simple fact that women lacked the vote. When Anthony, at age 32, attended her first woman's rights convention in Syracuse in 1852, she declared that the right which woman needed above every other, the one indeed which would secure to her all the others, was the right of suffrage. Anthony spent the next fifty-plus years of her life fighting for the right to vote. She would work tirelessly: giving speeches, petitioning Congress and …
After Georgia V. Ashcroft: The Primacy Of Proportionality, Felix B. Chang
After Georgia V. Ashcroft: The Primacy Of Proportionality, Felix B. Chang
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
This Note argues that the majority in Ashcroft have left courts with an unadministerable standard-not so much for reasons that Justice Souter articulated in his dissent, but rather because the Court provided no guidance on navigating around the myriad of factors in the convoluted totality analyses. Part I examines two cases after Ashcroft which represent different degrees of racial vote dilution: Shirt v. Hazeltine and Session v. Perry. Through other post-Ashcroft cases, Part II teases out the differences (i) between influence districts as injury and remedy and (ii) between a jurisdiction's Section 5 and Section 2 obligations--details closely related …
Political Realities And Unintended Consequences: Why Campaign Finance Reform Is Too Important To Be Left To The Lawyers, Kenneth R. Mayer
Political Realities And Unintended Consequences: Why Campaign Finance Reform Is Too Important To Be Left To The Lawyers, Kenneth R. Mayer
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Response To Voting With Dollars: A New Paradigm For Campaign Finance, Fred Wertheimer, Alexandra T.V. Edsall
Response To Voting With Dollars: A New Paradigm For Campaign Finance, Fred Wertheimer, Alexandra T.V. Edsall
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Voting With Cues, Elizabeth Garrett
Voting With Cues, Elizabeth Garrett
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cheap Talk Citizenship: The Democratic Implications Of Voting With Dollars, Bruce E. Cain
Cheap Talk Citizenship: The Democratic Implications Of Voting With Dollars, Bruce E. Cain
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dollars And Sense: A "New Paradigm" For Campaign Finance Reform?, Daniel A. Farber
Dollars And Sense: A "New Paradigm" For Campaign Finance Reform?, Daniel A. Farber
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why A New Paradigm?, Bruce Ackerman, Ian Ayres
Why A New Paradigm?, Bruce Ackerman, Ian Ayres
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Vouchers And Buckley: The Need For "Regime Change", Richard L. Hasan
Vouchers And Buckley: The Need For "Regime Change", Richard L. Hasan
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Review Of Initiatives And Referendums In Which Majorities Vote On Minorities’ Citizenship, Sylvia R. Lazos
Judicial Review Of Initiatives And Referendums In Which Majorities Vote On Minorities’ Citizenship, Sylvia R. Lazos
Scholarly Works
In this Article, Professor Lazos examines initiatives and referendums in which a majority is in a position to vote on the content of a minority's democratic civic standing. Case law fails to set forth a single test for judicial review; consequently, doctrinal and theoretical coherence in this area is nonexistent. Professor Lazos proposes a test that takes into account social dynamics and focuses on the impact of these measures. First, she examines outcomes over the last three decades of approximately eighty such initiatives and referendums, from the anti-integration movement of the sixties to today's ideological and cultural versions, such as …
Electoral Folklore: An Empirical Examination Of The Abortion Issue, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Electoral Folklore: An Empirical Examination Of The Abortion Issue, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Though partisans on both sides claim credit for electoral victories and defeats, and politicians treat both groups with deference, few studies have attempted to gauge the impact of the abortion issue in more than an anecdotal manner. In 1976, NARAL noted that of the 13 members of the U.S. Representatives that lost re-election bids, nine were pro-life, and four were pro-choice. A study conducted by the Alan Guttmacher Institute of the 1974 House races found that, in “competitive” districts, 92 percent of the pro-choice candidates studied were re-elected while only 61 percent of the pro-life candidates were returned to Congress, …