Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Political parties (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Citizenship (1)
- Confirmation hearing (1)
-
- Democratic theory (1)
- Disabilities (1)
- Elections (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Gerrymandering (1)
- Governance (1)
- Historicizing the state (1)
- History (1)
- Lawmaking (1)
- Low-income individuals (1)
- Media (1)
- Medicaid (1)
- Modern democratic state (1)
- Nominations (1)
- Partisanship (1)
- Poverty law (1)
- Public policy (1)
- Redistricting (1)
- Senate (1)
- Social Security (1)
- Social welfare (1)
- State interests (1)
- The state (1)
- Theory of the state (1)
- Trump Administration (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law and Politics
Disability, Universalism, Social Rights, And Citizenship, Samuel R. Bagenstos
Disability, Universalism, Social Rights, And Citizenship, Samuel R. Bagenstos
Articles
The 2016 election has had significant consequences for American social welfare policy. Some of these consequences are direct. By giving unified control of the federal government to the Republican Party for the first time in a decade, the election has potentially empowered conservatives to ram through a bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act—the landmark “Obamacare” law that marked the most significant expansion of the social welfare state since the 1960s. Other consequences are more indirect. Both the election result itself, and Republicans’ actions since, have spurred a renewed debate within the left-liberal coalition regarding the politics of social welfare …
Gerrymandering And The Constitutional Norm Against Government Partisanship, Michael S. Kang
Gerrymandering And The Constitutional Norm Against Government Partisanship, Michael S. Kang
Michigan Law Review
This Article challenges the basic premise in the law of gerrymandering that partisanship is a constitutional government purpose at all. The central problem, Justice Scalia once explained in Vieth v. Jubilerer, is that partisan gerrymandering becomes unconstitutional only when it “has gone too far,” giving rise to the intractable inquiry into “how much is too much.” But the premise that partisanship is an ordinary and lawful purpose, articulated confidently as settled law and widely understood as such, is largely wrong as constitutional doctrine. The Article surveys constitutional law to demonstrate the vitality of an important, if implicit norm against …
Confirmation Bias, Patrick Barry
Confirmation Bias, Patrick Barry
Articles
Supreme Court confirmation hearings are vapid. Supreme Court confirmation hearings are pointless. Supreme Court confirmation hearings are harmful to a citizenry already cynical about government. Sentiments like these have been around for decades and are bound to resurface each time a new nomination is made. This essay, however, takes a different view. It argues that Supreme Court confirmation hearings are a valuable form of cultural expression, one that provides a unique record of as the theater critic Martin Esslin might say, a nation thinking about itself in public.
Toward A History Of The Democratic State, William J. Novak, Stephen W. Sawyer, James T. Sparrow
Toward A History Of The Democratic State, William J. Novak, Stephen W. Sawyer, James T. Sparrow
Articles
Over the past generation, the history of the state has been experiencing a much-noted renaissance, especially in France and the United States. In the United States as late as 1986, Morton Keller complained to William Leuchtenburg in the Journal of American History: “To say that ‘there is much still to be learned about the nature of the State in America’ is … a major understatement. There is close to everything to be learned about the State.” In France as late as 1990, Pierre Rosanvallon’s powerful introduction to L’État en France suggested that an ambitious history of the state could not …