Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (39)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (17)
- Health Law and Policy (17)
- Supreme Court of the United States (8)
- Fourteenth Amendment (7)
-
- Law and Society (7)
- Family Law (6)
- State and Local Government Law (6)
- Arts and Humanities (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Sexuality and the Law (4)
- Conflict of Laws (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Privacy Law (3)
- First Amendment (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Judges (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Law and Race (2)
- Medical Jurisprudence (2)
- Philosophy (2)
- American Politics (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Disability Law (1)
- Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (1)
- Juvenile Law (1)
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (19)
- University of Michigan Law School (14)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Pepperdine University (2)
-
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Massachusetts Boston (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Washington and Lee Law Review (16)
- Michigan Law Review (10)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Washington and Lee Law Review Online (3)
-
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (2)
- Pepperdine Law Review (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Golden Gate University Law Review (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- New England Journal of Public Policy (1)
- Pace Law Review (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 52
Full-Text Articles in Law and Gender
“I Wish I Knew How It Would Feel To Be Free”: A Lamentation On Dobbs V. Jackson’S Pernicious Impact On The Lives And Liberty Of Women, April L. Cherry
“I Wish I Knew How It Would Feel To Be Free”: A Lamentation On Dobbs V. Jackson’S Pernicious Impact On The Lives And Liberty Of Women, April L. Cherry
Cleveland State Law Review
On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court overturned nearly fifty years of precedent when it declared in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that abortion was not a fundamental right, and therefore it was not protected by the Fourteenth Amendment and substantive due process. In law school corridors and legal scholar circles, discussion of the Court’s evisceration of abortion rights focused on the corresponding changes in Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence and the Court’s outright dismissal of stare decisis. But in homes, hospitals, community centers, and workplaces, different conversations were happening. Conversations, mostly had by women, concerned the real-life consequences of overturning …
Abortion Rights And Disability Equality: A New Constitutional Battleground, Allison M. Whelan, Michele Goodwin
Abortion Rights And Disability Equality: A New Constitutional Battleground, Allison M. Whelan, Michele Goodwin
Washington and Lee Law Review
Abortion rights and access are under siege in the United States. Even while current state-level attacks take on a newly aggressive scale and scope—emboldened by the United States Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization to overturn Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey—the legal landscape emerging in the wake of Dobbs is decades in the making. In this Article, we analyze the pre- and post-Roe landscapes, explaining that after the Supreme Court recognized a right to abortion in Roe in 1973, anti-abortionists sought to dismantle that right, first …
The Never-Ending Struggle For Reproductive Rights, Stephanie Toti
The Never-Ending Struggle For Reproductive Rights, Stephanie Toti
Michigan Law Review
For me, the annual Book Review issue is a time for reflection. It provides an opportunity to take stock of scholarly trends, reassess conventional wisdom, and gather new insights to apply to the practice of law. The reviews contained in this year’s issue address a wide range of subjects, including the history of public defenders, the use of bigotry rhetoric in conflicts over marriage and civil rights law, the role of cost-benefit analysis in federal policymaking, and racial inequities in tax policy. This impressive commentary on an astute and varied collection of books about the law will inspire many of …
Denouncing The Revival Of Pre-Roe V. Wade Abortion Bans In A Post-Dobbs World Through The Void Ab Initio And Presumption Of Validity Doctrines, Nora Greene
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
The United States Supreme Court voted to overturn Roe v. Wade in a leaked draft of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Written by Justice Alito and joined by four of the other conservative justices, the decision describes Roe as “egregiously wrong from the start” and blatantly overrules the landmark holding and its prodigy, Planned Parenthood v. Casey. In their state codes, nine states—Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Texas, West Virginia, and Wisconsin— have unrepealed criminal abortion bans enacted before Roe. These bans prohibit abortion at any point in pregnancy unless to preserve the life of the pregnant person …
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Wise Legal Giant, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Wise Legal Giant, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
If A Fetus Is A Person, It Should Get Child Support, Due Process, And Citizenship, Carliss N. Chatman
If A Fetus Is A Person, It Should Get Child Support, Due Process, And Citizenship, Carliss N. Chatman
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
This Article was originally published in The Washington Post on May 17, 2019. It has been edited and updated prior to its publication in the Washington and Lee Law Review.
Alabama has joined the growing number of states determined to overturn Roe v. Wade by banning abortion from conception forward. The Alabama Human Life Protection Act subjects a doctor who performs an abortion to as many as ninety-nine years in prison. The law has no exceptions for rape or incest. It redefines an “unborn child, child or person” as “[a] human being, specifically including an unborn child in utero …
Under Ten Eyes, Anthony Michael Kreis
Under Ten Eyes, Anthony Michael Kreis
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
Carliss Chatman’s If a Fetus Is a Person, It Should Get Child Support, Due Process and Citizenship brilliantly captures the moment America is in, where abortion rights hang in the balance as state legislators, like those in Alabama, Georgia, Ohio, and elsewhere clamor to embrace fetal personhood. But, as Professor Chatman illustrates, legislators have expressed no interest in the full logical extent of this policy or the rights that should attach to a fetus if their measures ultimately become effective. The article incisively demonstrates how fetal personhood is singularly focused on ending abortion in the United States and is gaining …
Personhood: Law, Common Sense, And Humane Opportunities, Helen M. Alvaré
Personhood: Law, Common Sense, And Humane Opportunities, Helen M. Alvaré
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
It is pointless to approach Professor Chatman’s argument on its own terms (to wit, “tak[ing] our laws seriously,” or equal application across myriad legal categories of “full personhood” rights) because these terms are neither seriously intended nor legally comprehensible. Instead, her essay is intended to create the impression that legally protecting unborn human lives against abortion opens up a Pandora’s box of legal complications so “ridiculous” and “far-fetched” that we should rather just leave things where they are under the federal Constitution post-Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. This impression, in turn, is a tool to …
Justice Blackmun And Individual Rights, Diane P. Wood
Justice Blackmun And Individual Rights, Diane P. Wood
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Of the many contributions Justice Blackmun has made to American jurisprudence, surely his record in the area of individual rights stands out for its importance. Throughout his career on the Supreme Court, he has displayed concern for a wide variety of individual and civil rights. He has rendered decisions on matters ranging from the most personal interests in autonomy and freedom from interference from government in life’s private realms, to the increasingly complex problems posed by discrimination based upon race, sex, national origin, alienage, illegitimacy, sexual orientation, and other characteristics. As his views have become well known to the public, …
Upholding A 40-Year-Old Promise: Why The Texas Sonogram Act Is Unlawful According To Planned Parenthood V. Casey, Vicki Toscano, Elizabeth Reiter
Upholding A 40-Year-Old Promise: Why The Texas Sonogram Act Is Unlawful According To Planned Parenthood V. Casey, Vicki Toscano, Elizabeth Reiter
Pace Law Review
This Article begins with a brief review in Part II of the three crucial Supreme Court cases on abortion rights: Roe v. Wade, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, and Gonzalez v. Carhart. Based on these cases, Part III formulates a constitutional test that courts should be using to determine whether an abortion regulation is constitutional that includes all of the factors identified by the Supreme Court as part of the “undue burden” analysis, factors that have been overlooked by many courts. Finally, Part IV applies this constitutional test to the Texas Sonogram Act, concluding that the act is …
Abortion And The Constitutional Right (Not) To Procreate, Mary Ziegler
Abortion And The Constitutional Right (Not) To Procreate, Mary Ziegler
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Emergency Contraceptives Or "Abortion-Inducing" Drugs? Empowering Women To Make Informed Decisions, Ryan M. Hrobak, Robin Fretwell Wilson
Emergency Contraceptives Or "Abortion-Inducing" Drugs? Empowering Women To Make Informed Decisions, Ryan M. Hrobak, Robin Fretwell Wilson
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
If The Purpose Fits: The Two Functions Of Casey'S Purpose Inquiry, Priscilla J. Smith
If The Purpose Fits: The Two Functions Of Casey'S Purpose Inquiry, Priscilla J. Smith
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Roe'S Effects On Family Law, Lynne Marie Kohm
Roe'S Effects On Family Law, Lynne Marie Kohm
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Re-Reading Roe V. Wade, Richard S. Myers
Re-Reading Roe V. Wade, Richard S. Myers
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Keynote Address: Untying The Moral Knot Of Abortion, Caitlin E. Borgmann
Keynote Address: Untying The Moral Knot Of Abortion, Caitlin E. Borgmann
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Consequences Of Abortion Restrictions For Women's Healthcare, Maya Manian
The Consequences Of Abortion Restrictions For Women's Healthcare, Maya Manian
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Overcoming Barriers To The Protection Of Viable Fetuses, Randy Beck
Overcoming Barriers To The Protection Of Viable Fetuses, Randy Beck
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why Strive For Balance In A Roe Symposium?, Samuel W. Calhoun
Why Strive For Balance In A Roe Symposium?, Samuel W. Calhoun
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Medical Assumption At The Foundation Of Roe V. Wade And Its Implications For Women's Health, Clarke Forsythe
The Medical Assumption At The Foundation Of Roe V. Wade And Its Implications For Women's Health, Clarke Forsythe
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Abortion Exceptionalism And Undue Burden Preemption, Caitlin E. Borgmann
Abortion Exceptionalism And Undue Burden Preemption, Caitlin E. Borgmann
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Roe, Casey, And Sex-Selection Abortion Bans, Thomas J. Molony
Roe, Casey, And Sex-Selection Abortion Bans, Thomas J. Molony
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Abortion Distortions, Caroline Mala Corbin
Abortion Distortions, Caroline Mala Corbin
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Previability Abortion And The Pain Of The Unborn, Teresa S. Collett
Previability Abortion And The Pain Of The Unborn, Teresa S. Collett
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Virginia's Targeted Regulations Of Abortion Providers: The Attempt To Regulation Abortion Out Of Existence, Katharine Greenier, Rebecca Glenberg
Virginia's Targeted Regulations Of Abortion Providers: The Attempt To Regulation Abortion Out Of Existence, Katharine Greenier, Rebecca Glenberg
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Innocent Burdens, James Edwin Mahon
Innocent Burdens, James Edwin Mahon
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Harris V. Mcrae: Whatever Happened To The Roe V. Wade Abortion Right?, Laura Crocker
Harris V. Mcrae: Whatever Happened To The Roe V. Wade Abortion Right?, Laura Crocker
Pepperdine Law Review
The controversial Roe v. Wade decision purportedly removed the abortion controversy from the political arena and set constitutional standards by which questions on the issue could be resolved. The enactment of the Hyde Amendment, a bill which generally forbids the use of Medicaid funds for abortions, was a recent political response to the abortion controversy. However, in the recent case of Harris v. McRae, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment and thus injected the abortion controversy back into the political arena. The author exhaustively examines the abortion controversy from the time of the Roe decision up …
The Scarlet Letter: The Supreme Court And The Language Of Abortion Stigma, Paula Abrams
The Scarlet Letter: The Supreme Court And The Language Of Abortion Stigma, Paula Abrams
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
Why does the Supreme Court refer to the woman who is seeking an abortion as "mother"? Surely the definition has not escaped the attention of a Court that frequently relies on the dictionary to define important terms or principles. And why does the Court choose to describe the fetus as a child? What message does this language send about abortion and the woman who seeks an abortion? The Court's abortion decisions embody an ongoing debate on the legitimacy of constitutional protection of the right to choose. This debate unfolds most obviously as a discourse on constitutional interpretation; disagreements within the …
The Policy Against Federal Funding For Abortions Extends Into The Realm Of Free Speech After Rust V. Sullivan, Loye M. Barton
The Policy Against Federal Funding For Abortions Extends Into The Realm Of Free Speech After Rust V. Sullivan, Loye M. Barton
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Possibility Of Compromise: Antiabortion Moderates After Roe V. Wade, 1973–1980, Mary Ziegler
The Possibility Of Compromise: Antiabortion Moderates After Roe V. Wade, 1973–1980, Mary Ziegler
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Leading studies argue that Roe itself radicalized debate and marginalized antiabortion moderates, either by issuing a sweeping decision before adequate public support had developed or by framing the opinion in terms of moral absolutes. The polarization narrative on which leading studies rely obscures important actors and arguments that defined the antiabortion movement of the 1970s. First, contrary to what the polarization narrative suggests, self-identified moderates played a significant role in the mainstream antiabortion movement, shaping policies on issues like the treatment of unwed mothers or the Equal Rights Amendment. Working in organizations like Feminists for Life (FFL) or American Citizens …