Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Judges (2)
- Bibliographical citations (1)
- Civil litigation (1)
- Comparative Law (1)
- Consent (1)
-
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Feminism (1)
- Gender (1)
- Globalization (1)
- Judges' gender (1)
- Judges--Evaluation (1)
- Judicial Appointments (1)
- Judicial decision making (1)
- Judicial decisionmaking (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Sex (Psychology) (1)
- U.K. Supreme Court (1)
- U.S. Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law and Gender
Advice And Consent Vs. Silence And Dissent? The Contrasting Roles Of The Legislature In U.S. And U.K. Judicial Appointments, Mary Clark
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
The Senate‘s role in judicial appointments has come under increasingly withering criticism for its uninformative and spectacle-like nature. At the same time, Britain has established two new judicial appointment processes - to accompany its new Supreme Court and existing lower courts - in which Parliament plays no role. This Article seeks to understand the reasons for the inclusion and exclusion of the legislature in the U.S. and U.K. judicial appointment processes adopted at the creation of their respective Supreme Courts.
The Article proceeds by highlighting the ideas and concerns motivating inclusion of the legislature in judicial appointments in the early …
Judging Women, Mitu Gulati, Stephen J. Choi, Mirya Holman, Eric A. Posner
Judging Women, Mitu Gulati, Stephen J. Choi, Mirya Holman, Eric A. Posner
Faculty Scholarship
Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s assertion that female judges might be “better” than male judges has generated accusations of sexism and potential bias. An equally controversial claim is that male judges are better than female judges because the latter have benefited from affirmative action. These claims are susceptible to empirical analysis. Primarily using a dataset of all the state high court judges in 1998-2000, we estimate three measures of judicial output: opinion production, outside state citations, and co-partisan disagreements. We find that the male and female judges perform at about the same level. Roughly similar findings show up in data from the …
White Male Heterosexist Norms In The Confirmation Process, Theresa M. Beiner
White Male Heterosexist Norms In The Confirmation Process, Theresa M. Beiner
Faculty Scholarship
Justice Sonia Sotomayor's confirmation hearing took a controversial turn when commentators picked up on a reference in the New York Times to a portion of a speech she gave in 2001. In that speech, then Judge Sotomayor opined that, "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." That statement, along with her participation in the per curiam decision in Ricci v. DeStefano, caused a minor storm during her confirmation. More recently, former Harvard Dean and former …
Judges' Gender And Employment Discrimination Cases: Emerging Evidence-Based Empirical Conclusions, Pat K. Chew
Judges' Gender And Employment Discrimination Cases: Emerging Evidence-Based Empirical Conclusions, Pat K. Chew
Articles
This article surveys the emerging empirical research on the relationship between the judges' gender and the results in employment discrimination cases.